EVGGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electrolux AB has a net margin of 48.89% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of 0.13%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 31.36% beat Electrolux AB's return on equity of -1.34%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electrolux AB has an analysts' consensus of $24.95 which suggests that it could grow by 91.14%. Given that Electrolux AB has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Electrolux AB is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electrolux AB has a beta of 1.251, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.067%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $2.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electrolux AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 44.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Electrolux AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $548.2M, which are smaller than Electrolux AB quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Evolution AB's net income of $268M is higher than Electrolux AB's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Electrolux AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 6.37x versus 0.14x for Electrolux AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a net margin of 48.89% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of 1.07%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 31.36% beat Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 24.58%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hennes & Mauritz AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution AB has higher upside potential than Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Evolution AB is more attractive than Hennes & Mauritz AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.506%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $2.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hennes & Mauritz AB offers a yield of 4.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Evolution AB pays 44.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays out 89.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $548.2M, which are smaller than Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues of $5B. Evolution AB's net income of $268M is higher than Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $53.8M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Hennes & Mauritz AB's PE ratio is 21.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 6.37x versus 1.03x for Hennes & Mauritz AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nobia AB has a net margin of 48.89% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of --. Evolution AB's return on equity of 31.36% beat Nobia AB's return on equity of --.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nobia AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution AB has higher upside potential than Nobia AB, analysts believe Evolution AB is more attractive than Nobia AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nobia AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $2.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nobia AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 44.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Nobia AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $548.2M, which are larger than Nobia AB quarterly revenues of --. Evolution AB's net income of $268M is higher than Nobia AB's net income of --. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Nobia AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 6.37x versus 0.04x for Nobia AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has a net margin of 48.89% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of -46.62%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 31.36% beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's return on equity of --.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has an analysts' consensus of $1.01 which suggests that it could fall by -7.53%. Given that Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $2.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 44.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $548.2M, which are smaller than Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC quarterly revenues of $572.6M. Evolution AB's net income of $268M is higher than Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's net income of -$267M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 6.37x versus 1.12x for Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.