ALV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a net margin of 5.4% compared to Autoliv's net margin of -1.61%. Autoliv's return on equity of 25.98% beat Cooper-Standard Holdings's return on equity of --.

Autoliv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.54%. On the other hand Cooper-Standard Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.27%. Given that Cooper-Standard Holdings has higher upside potential than Autoliv, analysts believe Cooper-Standard Holdings is more attractive than Autoliv.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cooper-Standard Holdings has a beta of 2.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 179.177%.

Autoliv has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Cooper-Standard Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoliv pays 46.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Cooper-Standard Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoliv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Cooper-Standard Holdings quarterly revenues of $685.4M. Autoliv's net income of $138M is higher than Cooper-Standard Holdings's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Autoliv's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.20x while Cooper-Standard Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv is 0.73x versus 0.09x for Cooper-Standard Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex has a net margin of 5.4% compared to Autoliv's net margin of 20.14%. Autoliv's return on equity of 25.98% beat Gentex's return on equity of 18.42%.

Autoliv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.54%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $35.02 which suggests that it could grow by 19.8%. Given that Autoliv has higher upside potential than Gentex, analysts believe Autoliv is more attractive than Gentex.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.403%.

Autoliv has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Gentex offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Autoliv pays 46.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 26.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Gentex quarterly revenues of $608.5M. Autoliv's net income of $138M is higher than Gentex's net income of $122.5M. Notably, Autoliv's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.20x while Gentex's PE ratio is 15.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv is 0.73x versus 2.83x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optec International has a net margin of 5.4% compared to Autoliv's net margin of --. Autoliv's return on equity of 25.98% beat Optec International's return on equity of --.

Autoliv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.54%. On the other hand Optec International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Autoliv has higher upside potential than Optec International, analysts believe Autoliv is more attractive than Optec International.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optec International has a beta of 3.464, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 246.416%.

Autoliv has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Optec International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoliv pays 46.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Optec International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoliv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Optec International quarterly revenues of --. Autoliv's net income of $138M is higher than Optec International's net income of --. Notably, Autoliv's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.20x while Optec International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv is 0.73x versus -- for Optec International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solid Power has a net margin of 5.4% compared to Autoliv's net margin of -482.03%. Autoliv's return on equity of 25.98% beat Solid Power's return on equity of -17.72%.

Autoliv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.54%. On the other hand Solid Power has an analysts' consensus of $3.67 which suggests that it could grow by 33.33%. Given that Solid Power has higher upside potential than Autoliv, analysts believe Solid Power is more attractive than Autoliv.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Autoliv has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Solid Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoliv pays 46.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Solid Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoliv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Solid Power quarterly revenues of $4.7M. Autoliv's net income of $138M is higher than Solid Power's net income of -$22.4M. Notably, Autoliv's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.20x while Solid Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv is 0.73x versus 14.90x for Solid Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.