HNNMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electrolux AB has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of 0.13%. Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 23.79% beat Electrolux AB's return on equity of -1.34%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electrolux AB has an analysts' consensus of $24.20 which suggests that it could grow by 72.82%. Given that Electrolux AB has higher upside potential than Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Electrolux AB is more attractive than Hennes & Mauritz AB.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electrolux AB has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.75%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.69%. Electrolux AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 89.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Electrolux AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Electrolux AB quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $403.5M is higher than Electrolux AB's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Electrolux AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.00x versus 0.15x for Electrolux AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution AB has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of 48.89%. Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 23.79% beat Evolution AB's return on equity of 31.36%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolution AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hennes & Mauritz AB has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Hennes & Mauritz AB is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution AB has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.558%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.69%. Evolution AB offers a yield of 4.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.14 per share. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 89.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB pays out 44.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Evolution AB quarterly revenues of $548.2M. Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $403.5M is higher than Evolution AB's net income of $268M. Notably, Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Evolution AB's PE ratio is 12.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.00x versus 7.31x for Evolution AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nobia AB has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of --. Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 23.79% beat Nobia AB's return on equity of --.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nobia AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hennes & Mauritz AB has higher upside potential than Nobia AB, analysts believe Hennes & Mauritz AB is more attractive than Nobia AB.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nobia AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.69%. Nobia AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 89.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Nobia AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Nobia AB quarterly revenues of --. Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $403.5M is higher than Nobia AB's net income of --. Notably, Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Nobia AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.00x versus 0.04x for Nobia AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of -46.62%. Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 23.79% beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's return on equity of --.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has an analysts' consensus of $1.01 which suggests that it could fall by -10%. Given that Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has higher upside potential than Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC is more attractive than Hennes & Mauritz AB.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.69%. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 89.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hennes & Mauritz AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC quarterly revenues of $572.6M. Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $403.5M is higher than Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's net income of -$267M. Notably, Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hennes & Mauritz AB is 1.00x versus 1.16x for Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.