HNNMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electrolux AB has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of -0.71%. Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 24.23% beat Electrolux AB's return on equity of -48.45%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electrolux AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.63%. Given that Electrolux AB has higher upside potential than Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Electrolux AB is more attractive than Hennes & Mauritz AB.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electrolux AB has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.658%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Electrolux AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 120.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Electrolux AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Electrolux AB quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $470.7M is higher than Electrolux AB's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.70x while Electrolux AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hennes & Mauritz AB is 0.98x versus 0.17x for Electrolux AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution AB has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of 63.27%. Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 24.23% beat Evolution AB's return on equity of 30.01%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolution AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hennes & Mauritz AB has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Hennes & Mauritz AB is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution AB has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.868%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Evolution AB offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.85 per share. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 120.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB pays out 39.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hennes & Mauritz AB's is not.

Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Evolution AB quarterly revenues of $571.2M. Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $470.7M is higher than Evolution AB's net income of $361.4M. Notably, Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.70x while Evolution AB's PE ratio is 12.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hennes & Mauritz AB is 0.98x versus 7.39x for Evolution AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nobia AB has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of --. Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 24.23% beat Nobia AB's return on equity of --.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nobia AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hennes & Mauritz AB has higher upside potential than Nobia AB, analysts believe Hennes & Mauritz AB is more attractive than Nobia AB.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nobia AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Nobia AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 120.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Nobia AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Nobia AB quarterly revenues of --. Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $470.7M is higher than Nobia AB's net income of --. Notably, Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.70x while Nobia AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hennes & Mauritz AB is 0.98x versus 0.06x for Nobia AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Hennes & Mauritz AB's net margin of -46.62%. Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 24.23% beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's return on equity of --.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 39.32%. Given that Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has higher upside potential than Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC is more attractive than Hennes & Mauritz AB.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays 120.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC quarterly revenues of $572.6M. Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $470.7M is higher than Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's net income of -$267M. Notably, Hennes & Mauritz AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.70x while Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hennes & Mauritz AB is 0.98x versus 1.11x for Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.