ZETA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HubSpot has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -3.05%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 97.15%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $752.73 which suggests that it could grow by 31.24%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.13%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $714.1M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is higher than HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HubSpot's PE ratio is 6,700.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.35x versus 11.01x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PubMatic has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -14.86%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat PubMatic's return on equity of 1.97%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 97.15%. On the other hand PubMatic has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 34.32%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than PubMatic.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PubMatic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PubMatic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are larger than PubMatic quarterly revenues of $63.8M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than PubMatic's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PubMatic's PE ratio is 144.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.35x versus 2.21x for PubMatic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RingCentral has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -1.69%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat RingCentral's return on equity of --.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 97.15%. On the other hand RingCentral has an analysts' consensus of $33.38 which suggests that it could grow by 24%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than RingCentral.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RingCentral has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.969%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RingCentral offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RingCentral pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than RingCentral quarterly revenues of $612.1M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RingCentral's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.35x versus 1.01x for RingCentral. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 1.71%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat Twilio's return on equity of -0.4%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 97.15%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $128.80 which suggests that it could grow by 9.48%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than Twilio.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.482%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than Twilio's net income of $20M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.35x versus 4.16x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.