HUBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Freshworks has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -0.66%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -6.63%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $754.52, signalling upside risk potential of 27.91%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $19.81 which suggests that it could grow by 29.75%. Given that Freshworks has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Freshworks is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are larger than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $196.3M. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Freshworks's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.32x versus 6.13x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parsons has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 4.26%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat Parsons's return on equity of 16.94%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $754.52, signalling upside risk potential of 27.91%. On the other hand Parsons has an analysts' consensus of $80.79 which suggests that it could grow by 24.59%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Parsons.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parsons has a beta of 0.569, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.105%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Parsons offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parsons pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are smaller than Parsons quarterly revenues of $1.6B. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Parsons's net income of $66.2M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while Parsons's PE ratio is 27.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.32x versus 1.09x for Parsons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 1.71%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat Twilio's return on equity of -0.4%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $754.52, signalling upside risk potential of 27.91%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $128.80 which suggests that it could grow by 9.43%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Twilio.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.438, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.816%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.2B. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Twilio's net income of $20M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.32x versus 4.14x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -8.17%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $754.52, signalling upside risk potential of 27.91%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could grow by 95.97%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.32x versus 2.40x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.