HUBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of 1.22% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -8.56%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.68% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -4.31%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $732.16, signalling upside risk potential of 1.5%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $11.85 which suggests that it could grow by 37.53%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.162%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $669.7M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.6M. HubSpot's net income of $8.1M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$392.9K. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 227.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 14.72x versus 3.56x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pros Holdings has a net margin of 1.22% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 0.28%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.68% beat Pros Holdings's return on equity of --.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $732.16, signalling upside risk potential of 1.5%. On the other hand Pros Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35.81%. Given that Pros Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Pros Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pros Holdings has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.585%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pros Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pros Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $669.7M, which are larger than Pros Holdings quarterly revenues of $82.7M. HubSpot's net income of $8.1M is higher than Pros Holdings's net income of $235K. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pros Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 14.72x versus 3.28x for Pros Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 1.22% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -1.23%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.68% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $732.16, signalling upside risk potential of 1.5%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.4%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.645%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $669.7M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. HubSpot's net income of $8.1M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 14.72x versus 0.31x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 1.22% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -6.48%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.68% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $732.16, signalling upside risk potential of 1.5%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 101.54%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $669.7M, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $268.3M. HubSpot's net income of $8.1M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 14.72x versus 3.64x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.