TWLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HubSpot has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Twilio's net margin of -3.05%. Twilio's return on equity of -0.4% beat HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33%.

Twilio has a consensus price target of $130.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.73%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $745.38 which suggests that it could grow by 38.39%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Twilio.

Twilio has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.173% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.598%.

Twilio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twilio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Twilio quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $714.1M. Twilio's net income of $20M is higher than HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M. Notably, Twilio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HubSpot's PE ratio is 6,700.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twilio is 4.17x versus 10.34x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OneStream has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Twilio's net margin of -17.62%. Twilio's return on equity of -0.4% beat OneStream's return on equity of -60.69%.

Twilio has a consensus price target of $130.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.73%. On the other hand OneStream has an analysts' consensus of $31.32 which suggests that it could grow by 23.39%. Given that OneStream has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe OneStream is more attractive than Twilio.

Twilio has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.173% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OneStream has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Twilio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OneStream offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twilio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OneStream pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Twilio quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than OneStream quarterly revenues of $136.3M. Twilio's net income of $20M is higher than OneStream's net income of -$24M. Notably, Twilio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while OneStream's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twilio is 4.17x versus 8.19x for OneStream. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UiPath has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Twilio's net margin of -6.33%. Twilio's return on equity of -0.4% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.7%.

Twilio has a consensus price target of $130.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.73%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $14.39 which suggests that it could grow by 15.26%. Given that UiPath has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe UiPath is more attractive than Twilio.

Twilio has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.173% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Twilio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twilio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Twilio quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than UiPath quarterly revenues of $356.6M. Twilio's net income of $20M is higher than UiPath's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, Twilio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twilio is 4.17x versus 4.77x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RingCentral has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Twilio's net margin of -1.69%. Twilio's return on equity of -0.4% beat RingCentral's return on equity of --.

Twilio has a consensus price target of $130.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.73%. On the other hand RingCentral has an analysts' consensus of $34.34 which suggests that it could grow by 29.59%. Given that RingCentral has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe RingCentral is more attractive than Twilio.

Twilio has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.173% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RingCentral has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.829%.

Twilio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RingCentral offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twilio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RingCentral pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Twilio quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than RingCentral quarterly revenues of $612.1M. Twilio's net income of $20M is higher than RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Twilio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RingCentral's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twilio is 4.17x versus 1.00x for RingCentral. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.