Financhill
Sell
33

XPOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$8.44
Seasonality move :
9.22%
Day range:
$8.14 - $8.69
52-week range:
$6.64 - $18.95
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.84x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
448K
Avg. volume:
673.5K
1-year change:
-29.87%
Market cap:
$285.3M
Revenue:
$320.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$2.04

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
XPOF
Xponential Fitness
$75.4M $0.15 1.03% 151.39% $13.78
FXLV
F45 Training Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
HWH
HWH International
-- -- -- -- --
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings
$683M $0.28 12.67% 39.42% $38.04
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment
$358.3M $0.24 4.95% -96.12% $13.35
PLNT
Planet Fitness
$279.8M $0.62 9.68% 40% $112.45
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
XPOF
Xponential Fitness
$8.17 $13.78 $285.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.84x
FXLV
F45 Training Holdings
$0.11 -- $10.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.18x
HWH
HWH International
$1.29 -- $8.4M -- $0.00 0% 4.56x
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings
$27.14 $38.04 $6B 28.27x $0.00 0% 2.15x
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment
$9.07 $13.35 $1.3B 19.11x $0.06 2.43% 1.15x
PLNT
Planet Fitness
$102.62 $112.45 $8.6B 48.41x $0.00 0% 7.22x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
XPOF
Xponential Fitness
266.48% 5.166 179.17% 0.52x
FXLV
F45 Training Holdings
-- 1.451 -- --
HWH
HWH International
21.45% 3.854 12.07% 2.10x
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings
35.74% 1.146 23.11% 0.18x
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment
107.22% 1.830 85.35% 0.42x
PLNT
Planet Fitness
111.3% 1.956 26.75% 1.78x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
XPOF
Xponential Fitness
$51.5M $3M -80.87% -- 11.98% $5M
FXLV
F45 Training Holdings
-- -- -- -- -- --
HWH
HWH International
$147.6K -$516.7K -159.38% -- -162.95% -$555.3K
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings
$335.1M $107.7M 4.91% 8.25% 15.25% $41.4M
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment
$144.1M $62.8M 0.22% -203.93% 23.85% $61.1M
PLNT
Planet Fitness
$150.6M $79.2M 9.41% -- 30.83% $109.4M

Xponential Fitness vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns XPOF or FXLV?

    F45 Training Holdings has a net margin of -1.76% compared to Xponential Fitness's net margin of --. Xponential Fitness's return on equity of -- beat F45 Training Holdings's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    66.93% -$0.10 $46.8M
    FXLV
    F45 Training Holdings
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About XPOF or FXLV?

    Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling upside risk potential of 68.64%. On the other hand F45 Training Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2627.27%. Given that F45 Training Holdings has higher upside potential than Xponential Fitness, analysts believe F45 Training Holdings is more attractive than Xponential Fitness.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    3 4 0
    FXLV
    F45 Training Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is XPOF or FXLV More Risky?

    Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F45 Training Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPOF or FXLV?

    Xponential Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. F45 Training Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness pays -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend. F45 Training Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPOF or FXLV?

    Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues are $76.9M, which are larger than F45 Training Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M is higher than F45 Training Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Xponential Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while F45 Training Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness is 0.84x versus 0.18x for F45 Training Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    0.84x -- $76.9M -$1.4M
    FXLV
    F45 Training Holdings
    0.18x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns XPOF or HWH?

    HWH International has a net margin of -1.76% compared to Xponential Fitness's net margin of -191.44%. Xponential Fitness's return on equity of -- beat HWH International's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    66.93% -$0.10 $46.8M
    HWH
    HWH International
    50% -$0.09 $4.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About XPOF or HWH?

    Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling upside risk potential of 68.64%. On the other hand HWH International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than HWH International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    3 4 0
    HWH
    HWH International
    0 0 0
  • Is XPOF or HWH More Risky?

    Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPOF or HWH?

    Xponential Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HWH International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness pays -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPOF or HWH?

    Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues are $76.9M, which are larger than HWH International quarterly revenues of $295.2K. Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M is lower than HWH International's net income of -$565.1K. Notably, Xponential Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HWH International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness is 0.84x versus 4.56x for HWH International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    0.84x -- $76.9M -$1.4M
    HWH
    HWH International
    4.56x -- $295.2K -$565.1K
  • Which has Higher Returns XPOF or LTH?

    Life Time Group Holdings has a net margin of -1.76% compared to Xponential Fitness's net margin of 10.78%. Xponential Fitness's return on equity of -- beat Life Time Group Holdings's return on equity of 8.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    66.93% -$0.10 $46.8M
    LTH
    Life Time Group Holdings
    47.46% $0.34 $4.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About XPOF or LTH?

    Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling upside risk potential of 68.64%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $38.04 which suggests that it could grow by 40.16%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Life Time Group Holdings, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Life Time Group Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    3 4 0
    LTH
    Life Time Group Holdings
    8 3 0
  • Is XPOF or LTH More Risky?

    Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPOF or LTH?

    Xponential Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Time Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness pays -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPOF or LTH?

    Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues are $76.9M, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $706M. Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Life Time Group Holdings's net income of $76.1M. Notably, Xponential Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Life Time Group Holdings's PE ratio is 28.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness is 0.84x versus 2.15x for Life Time Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    0.84x -- $76.9M -$1.4M
    LTH
    Life Time Group Holdings
    2.15x 28.27x $706M $76.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns XPOF or LUCK?

    Lucky Strike Entertainment has a net margin of -1.76% compared to Xponential Fitness's net margin of 3.91%. Xponential Fitness's return on equity of -- beat Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    66.93% -$0.10 $46.8M
    LUCK
    Lucky Strike Entertainment
    42.39% $0.07 $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About XPOF or LUCK?

    Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling upside risk potential of 68.64%. On the other hand Lucky Strike Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $13.35 which suggests that it could grow by 47.19%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Lucky Strike Entertainment, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Lucky Strike Entertainment.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    3 4 0
    LUCK
    Lucky Strike Entertainment
    7 3 0
  • Is XPOF or LUCK More Risky?

    Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPOF or LUCK?

    Xponential Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucky Strike Entertainment offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Xponential Fitness pays -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays out -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPOF or LUCK?

    Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues are $76.9M, which are smaller than Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues of $339.9M. Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M. Notably, Xponential Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucky Strike Entertainment's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness is 0.84x versus 1.15x for Lucky Strike Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    0.84x -- $76.9M -$1.4M
    LUCK
    Lucky Strike Entertainment
    1.15x 19.11x $339.9M $13.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns XPOF or PLNT?

    Planet Fitness has a net margin of -1.76% compared to Xponential Fitness's net margin of 15.13%. Xponential Fitness's return on equity of -- beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    66.93% -$0.10 $46.8M
    PLNT
    Planet Fitness
    54.42% $0.50 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About XPOF or PLNT?

    Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling upside risk potential of 68.64%. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $112.45 which suggests that it could grow by 9.58%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Planet Fitness.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    3 4 0
    PLNT
    Planet Fitness
    10 2 0
  • Is XPOF or PLNT More Risky?

    Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.859%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPOF or PLNT?

    Xponential Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness pays -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios XPOF or PLNT?

    Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues are $76.9M, which are smaller than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $276.7M. Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M. Notably, Xponential Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 48.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness is 0.84x versus 7.22x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    XPOF
    Xponential Fitness
    0.84x -- $76.9M -$1.4M
    PLNT
    Planet Fitness
    7.22x 48.41x $276.7M $41.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?
Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?

Ever tried to send a text from the Nevada desert…

Is TTD The Big Winner If Pharma Ads Are Banned?
Is TTD The Big Winner If Pharma Ads Are Banned?

Last week, Senators Bernie Sanders and Angus King introduced a…

Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?
Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?

By every traditional yardstick, including a price‑to‑sales well above 100,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 48x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Alerts

Sell
11
VEON alert for Jun 16

VEON [VEON] is up 3.15% over the past day.

Buy
74
DAVE alert for Jun 16

Dave [DAVE] is up 3.49% over the past day.

Buy
54
DAR alert for Jun 16

Darling Ingredients [DAR] is up 8.25% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock