HWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Life Time Group Holdings has a net margin of -191.44% compared to HWH International's net margin of 10.78%. HWH International's return on equity of -- beat Life Time Group Holdings's return on equity of 8.25%.

HWH International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $38.10 which suggests that it could grow by 27.98%. Given that Life Time Group Holdings has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Life Time Group Holdings is more attractive than HWH International.

HWH International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HWH International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Time Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HWH International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HWH International quarterly revenues are $295.2K, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $706M. HWH International's net income of -$565.1K is lower than Life Time Group Holdings's net income of $76.1M. Notably, HWH International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Life Time Group Holdings's PE ratio is 31.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HWH International is 4.63x versus 2.36x for Life Time Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a net margin of -191.44% compared to HWH International's net margin of 3.91%. HWH International's return on equity of -- beat Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93%.

HWH International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lucky Strike Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $13.25 which suggests that it could grow by 42.47%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than HWH International.

HWH International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HWH International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucky Strike Entertainment offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. HWH International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays out -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

HWH International quarterly revenues are $295.2K, which are smaller than Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues of $339.9M. HWH International's net income of -$565.1K is lower than Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M. Notably, HWH International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucky Strike Entertainment's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HWH International is 4.63x versus 1.18x for Lucky Strike Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of -191.44% compared to HWH International's net margin of 15.13%. HWH International's return on equity of -- beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.

HWH International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $113.12 which suggests that it could grow by 4.84%. Given that Planet Fitness has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Planet Fitness is more attractive than HWH International.

HWH International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.859%.

HWH International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HWH International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HWH International quarterly revenues are $295.2K, which are smaller than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $276.7M. HWH International's net income of -$565.1K is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M. Notably, HWH International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 50.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HWH International is 4.63x versus 7.59x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of -191.44% compared to HWH International's net margin of -1.76%. HWH International's return on equity of -- beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.

HWH International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $13.78 which suggests that it could grow by 78.24%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than HWH International.

HWH International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HWH International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HWH International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

HWH International quarterly revenues are $295.2K, which are smaller than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $76.9M. HWH International's net income of -$565.1K is higher than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, HWH International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HWH International is 4.63x versus 0.80x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.