LUCK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HWH International has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment's net margin of -191.44%. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93% beat HWH International's return on equity of --.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.47%. On the other hand HWH International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than HWH International.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. HWH International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues are $339.9M, which are larger than HWH International quarterly revenues of $295.2K. Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M is higher than HWH International's net income of -$565.1K. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while HWH International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment is 1.18x versus 4.63x for HWH International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Life Time Group Holdings has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment's net margin of 10.78%. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93% beat Life Time Group Holdings's return on equity of 8.25%.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.47%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $38.10 which suggests that it could grow by 27.98%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than Life Time Group Holdings, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than Life Time Group Holdings.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Life Time Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues are $339.9M, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $706M. Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M is lower than Life Time Group Holdings's net income of $76.1M. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while Life Time Group Holdings's PE ratio is 31.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment is 1.18x versus 2.36x for Life Time Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment's net margin of 15.13%. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93% beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.47%. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $113.12 which suggests that it could grow by 4.84%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than Planet Fitness.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.859%.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues are $339.9M, which are larger than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $276.7M. Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 50.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment is 1.18x versus 7.59x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment's net margin of -1.76%. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93% beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.47%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $13.78 which suggests that it could grow by 78.24%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Lucky Strike Entertainment, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Lucky Strike Entertainment.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues are $339.9M, which are larger than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $76.9M. Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M is higher than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment is 1.18x versus 0.80x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.