PLNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HWH International has a net margin of 15.13% compared to Planet Fitness's net margin of -191.44%. Planet Fitness's return on equity of -- beat HWH International's return on equity of --.

Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $113.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.24%. On the other hand HWH International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Planet Fitness has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Planet Fitness is more attractive than HWH International.

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HWH International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Fitness pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Fitness quarterly revenues are $276.7M, which are larger than HWH International quarterly revenues of $295.2K. Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M is higher than HWH International's net income of -$565.1K. Notably, Planet Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.75x while HWH International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Fitness is 7.42x versus 4.27x for HWH International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Life Time Group Holdings has a net margin of 15.13% compared to Planet Fitness's net margin of 10.78%. Planet Fitness's return on equity of -- beat Life Time Group Holdings's return on equity of 8.25%.

Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $113.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.24%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $38.10 which suggests that it could grow by 30.7%. Given that Life Time Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, analysts believe Life Time Group Holdings is more attractive than Planet Fitness.

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Time Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Fitness pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Fitness quarterly revenues are $276.7M, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $706M. Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M is lower than Life Time Group Holdings's net income of $76.1M. Notably, Planet Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.75x while Life Time Group Holdings's PE ratio is 30.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Fitness is 7.42x versus 2.31x for Life Time Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a net margin of 15.13% compared to Planet Fitness's net margin of 3.91%. Planet Fitness's return on equity of -- beat Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93%.

Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $113.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.24%. On the other hand Lucky Strike Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $13.25 which suggests that it could grow by 45.13%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than Planet Fitness.

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucky Strike Entertainment offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Planet Fitness pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays out -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Fitness quarterly revenues are $276.7M, which are smaller than Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues of $339.9M. Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M is higher than Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M. Notably, Planet Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.75x while Lucky Strike Entertainment's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Fitness is 7.42x versus 1.16x for Lucky Strike Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of 15.13% compared to Planet Fitness's net margin of -1.76%. Planet Fitness's return on equity of -- beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.

Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $113.12, signalling upside risk potential of 7.24%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $13.78 which suggests that it could grow by 78.24%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Planet Fitness.

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Fitness pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Fitness quarterly revenues are $276.7M, which are larger than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $76.9M. Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M is higher than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Planet Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.75x while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Fitness is 7.42x versus 0.80x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.