WTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Donegal Group has a net margin of 5.87% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group's net margin of 10.28%. White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity of 0.55% beat Donegal Group's return on equity of 13.42%.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Donegal Group has an analysts' consensus of $19.50 which suggests that it could fall by -3.47%. Given that Donegal Group has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group, analysts believe Donegal Group is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donegal Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.046%.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Donegal Group offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group pays 1.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Donegal Group pays out 44.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $577.8M, which are larger than Donegal Group quarterly revenues of $245.2M. White Mountains Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M is higher than Donegal Group's net income of $25.2M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 164.50x while Donegal Group's PE ratio is 9.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group is 1.98x versus 0.70x for Donegal Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 5.87% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group's net margin of 7.31%. White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity of 0.55% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -14.78%. Given that Safety Insurance Group has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group, analysts believe Safety Insurance Group is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.16%.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group pays 1.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $577.8M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. White Mountains Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 164.50x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group is 1.98x versus 1.06x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 5.87% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group's net margin of 8.55%. White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity of 0.55% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.55%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.059%.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group pays 1.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $577.8M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. White Mountains Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 164.50x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group is 1.98x versus 1.08x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 5.87% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group's net margin of 5.35%. White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity of 0.55% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6%.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.45%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.488, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.206%.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. White Mountains Insurance Group pays 1.09% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

White Mountains Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $577.8M, which are larger than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.1M. White Mountains Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M is higher than United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M. Notably, White Mountains Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 164.50x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 11.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for White Mountains Insurance Group is 1.98x versus 0.57x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.