MKL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 3.66% compared to Markel Group's net margin of 7.31%. Markel Group's return on equity of 10.77% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

Markel Group has a consensus price target of $1,895.20, signalling downside risk potential of -6.72%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.15%. Given that Markel Group has more downside risk than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Safety Insurance Group is more attractive than Markel Group.

Markel Group has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.54% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.255, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.478%.

Markel Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Markel Group pays 1.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Markel Group quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. Markel Group's net income of $121.7M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Markel Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.97x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 14.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Markel Group is 1.69x versus 0.94x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 3.66% compared to Markel Group's net margin of 8.55%. Markel Group's return on equity of 10.77% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Markel Group has a consensus price target of $1,895.20, signalling downside risk potential of -6.72%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.74%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Markel Group, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than Markel Group.

Markel Group has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.54% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.821%.

Markel Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Markel Group pays 1.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Markel Group quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Markel Group's net income of $121.7M is higher than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Markel Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.97x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 24.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Markel Group is 1.69x versus 1.10x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 3.66% compared to Markel Group's net margin of 5.35%. Markel Group's return on equity of 10.77% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6%.

Markel Group has a consensus price target of $1,895.20, signalling downside risk potential of -6.72%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.41%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Markel Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Markel Group.

Markel Group has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.54% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.605%.

Markel Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Markel Group pays 1.31% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Markel Group quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.1M. Markel Group's net income of $121.7M is higher than United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Markel Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.97x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 10.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Markel Group is 1.69x versus 0.55x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 3.66% compared to Markel Group's net margin of 5.87%. Markel Group's return on equity of 10.77% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity of 0.55%.

Markel Group has a consensus price target of $1,895.20, signalling downside risk potential of -6.72%. On the other hand White Mountains Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Markel Group has higher upside potential than White Mountains Insurance Group, analysts believe Markel Group is more attractive than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Markel Group has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.54% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.355, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.461%.

Markel Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. White Mountains Insurance Group offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Markel Group pays 1.31% of its earnings as a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 1.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Markel Group quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than White Mountains Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $577.8M. Markel Group's net income of $121.7M is higher than White Mountains Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Markel Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.97x while White Mountains Insurance Group's PE ratio is 167.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Markel Group is 1.69x versus 2.01x for White Mountains Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.