UFCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HCI Group has a net margin of 5.35% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 32.1%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 28.29%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.42%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $202.50 which suggests that it could grow by 39.24%. Given that HCI Group has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe HCI Group is more attractive than United Fire Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.504, which suggesting that the stock is 49.605% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.647%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. HCI Group offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.1M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $217.1M. United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M is lower than HCI Group's net income of $69.7M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.94x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 14.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.56x versus 2.33x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 5.35% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 13.2%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6% beat Heritage Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 27.99%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.42%. On the other hand Heritage Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.98%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings is more attractive than United Fire Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.504, which suggesting that the stock is 49.605% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Insurance Holdings has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.369%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Heritage Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Insurance Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.1M, which are larger than Heritage Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $230.9M. United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M is lower than Heritage Insurance Holdings's net income of $30.5M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.94x while Heritage Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 8.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.56x versus 0.81x for Heritage Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 5.35% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 7.31%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.42%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -8.28%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.504, which suggesting that the stock is 49.605% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.255, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.478%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.1M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.94x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.56x versus 0.99x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 5.35% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 8.55%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.42%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.29%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than United Fire Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.504, which suggesting that the stock is 49.605% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.821%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.1M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.94x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.56x versus 1.04x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.