TPR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hooker Furnishings has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -3.58%. Tapestry's return on equity of 37.43% beat Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -5.48%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $89.08, signalling upside risk potential of 5.63%. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 69.66%. Given that Hooker Furnishings has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Hooker Furnishings is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 46.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.913%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.66%. Hooker Furnishings offers a yield of 9.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings pays out -78.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues of $85.3M. Tapestry's net income of $203.3M is higher than Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.19x while Hooker Furnishings's PE ratio is 121.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.79x versus 0.27x for Hooker Furnishings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -4.88%. Tapestry's return on equity of 37.43% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $89.08, signalling upside risk potential of 5.63%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.64 which suggests that it could grow by 24.03%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 46.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.573%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.66%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Tapestry's net income of $203.3M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.19x while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.79x versus 1.19x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -43.95%. Tapestry's return on equity of 37.43% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $89.08, signalling upside risk potential of 5.63%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.87 which suggests that it could grow by 9.57%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 46.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.66%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Tapestry's net income of $203.3M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.19x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.79x versus 2.85x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 2.12%. Tapestry's return on equity of 37.43% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $89.08, signalling upside risk potential of 5.63%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $301.97 which suggests that it could fall by -6.46%. Given that Tapestry has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Tapestry is more attractive than Tesla.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 46.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.66%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Tapestry's net income of $203.3M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.19x while Tesla's PE ratio is 177.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.79x versus 11.80x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.