MAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Mattel's net margin of 17.42%. Mattel's return on equity of 26.12% beat Hasbro's return on equity of -46.99%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $23.22, signalling upside risk potential of 33.58%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $60.96 which suggests that it could grow by 39.26%. Given that Hasbro has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Hasbro is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.093%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hasbro offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out -26.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Mattel's net income of $372.4M is higher than Hasbro's net income of $223.2M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.21x while Hasbro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.16x versus 1.85x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Mattel's net margin of 16.25%. Mattel's return on equity of 26.12% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.64%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $23.22, signalling upside risk potential of 33.58%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.47%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.862%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $321.6M. Mattel's net income of $372.4M is higher than Jakks Pacific's net income of $52.3M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.21x while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 10.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.16x versus 0.43x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PLBY Group has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Mattel's net margin of -262.4%. Mattel's return on equity of 26.12% beat PLBY Group's return on equity of -314.81%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $23.22, signalling upside risk potential of 33.58%. On the other hand PLBY Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -42.68%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than PLBY Group, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than PLBY Group.

Mattel has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PLBY Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PLBY Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PLBY Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than PLBY Group quarterly revenues of $12.9M. Mattel's net income of $372.4M is higher than PLBY Group's net income of -$33.8M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.21x while PLBY Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.16x versus 0.73x for PLBY Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SRM Entertainment has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Mattel's net margin of -128.81%. Mattel's return on equity of 26.12% beat SRM Entertainment's return on equity of -112.23%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $23.22, signalling upside risk potential of 33.58%. On the other hand SRM Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than SRM Entertainment, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than SRM Entertainment.

Mattel has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SRM Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SRM Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SRM Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than SRM Entertainment quarterly revenues of $876.4K. Mattel's net income of $372.4M is higher than SRM Entertainment's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.21x while SRM Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.16x versus 1.46x for SRM Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.