SPXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 10.61% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 15.25%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.11% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.3%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $174.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.08%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $38.10 which suggests that it could fall by -7.34%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Fastenal.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.877%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $482.6M, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $2B. SPX Technologies's net income of $51.2M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.7M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.64x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 40.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.81x versus 6.21x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of 10.61% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 5.38%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.11% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 28.89%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $174.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.08%. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $229.20 which suggests that it could grow by 4.47%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.359%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $482.6M, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $7.6B. SPX Technologies's net income of $51.2M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $410M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.64x while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 27.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.81x versus 1.46x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 10.61% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 9.24%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.11% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $174.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.08%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $514.17 which suggests that it could grow by 1.29%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.61%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $482.6M, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. SPX Technologies's net income of $51.2M is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.64x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 30.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.81x versus 2.48x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 10.61% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 8.47%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.11% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 38.3%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $174.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.08%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than IES Holdings.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.946%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $482.6M, which are smaller than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $834M. SPX Technologies's net income of $51.2M is lower than IES Holdings's net income of $70.7M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.64x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 23.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.81x versus 1.83x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.