FERG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 15.61%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $222.71, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $66.88 which suggests that it could grow by 0.8%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Fastenal.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.394% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.399%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M is higher than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.29x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 37.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.21x versus 5.76x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 8.07%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 33.79%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $222.71, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.34%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.394% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.538%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M is higher than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $146.2M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.29x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 33.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.21x versus 2.40x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 8.14%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.82%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $222.71, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.394% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.178%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $775.8M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.29x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 21.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.21x versus 1.49x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 10.38%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $222.71, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $174.40 which suggests that it could grow by 18.91%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than SPX Technologies, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than SPX Technologies.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.394% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.479%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $483.7M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M is higher than SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.29x while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 39.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.21x versus 3.59x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.