NPO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Enpro's net margin of 5.54%. Enpro's return on equity of 5.9% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Enpro has a consensus price target of $222.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Enpro has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Enpro pays 34.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enpro quarterly revenues are $273.2M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Enpro's net income of $24.5M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.13x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 4.00x versus 0.45x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hillenbrand has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Enpro's net margin of -5.71%. Enpro's return on equity of 5.9% beat Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26%.

Enpro has a consensus price target of $222.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Hillenbrand has an analysts' consensus of $32.67 which suggests that it could grow by 44.8%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Enpro, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Enpro.

Enpro has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.186%.

Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Hillenbrand offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Enpro pays 34.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enpro quarterly revenues are $273.2M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand quarterly revenues of $715.9M. Enpro's net income of $24.5M is higher than Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.13x while Hillenbrand's PE ratio is 34.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 4.00x versus 0.52x for Hillenbrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Enpro's net margin of 2.05%. Enpro's return on equity of 5.9% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

Enpro has a consensus price target of $222.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -17.42%. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Enpro has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.648%.

Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Enpro pays 34.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enpro quarterly revenues are $273.2M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Enpro's net income of $24.5M is higher than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.13x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 8.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 4.00x versus 0.15x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Enpro's net margin of -0.71%. Enpro's return on equity of 5.9% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

Enpro has a consensus price target of $222.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.32%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $33.45 which suggests that it could fall by -20.75%. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Symbotic.

Enpro has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enpro pays 34.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enpro quarterly revenues are $273.2M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Enpro's net income of $24.5M is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.13x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 4.00x versus 2.14x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.