ACTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hillenbrand has a net margin of 19.52% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -5.71%. Acacia Research's return on equity of -2% beat Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26%.

Acacia Research has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 63.49%. On the other hand Hillenbrand has an analysts' consensus of $32.67 which suggests that it could grow by 44.8%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Hillenbrand, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Hillenbrand.

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.186%.

Acacia Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hillenbrand offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Acacia Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

Acacia Research quarterly revenues are $124.4M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand quarterly revenues of $715.9M. Acacia Research's net income of $24.3M is higher than Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M. Notably, Acacia Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.84x while Hillenbrand's PE ratio is 34.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research is 1.65x versus 0.52x for Hillenbrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enpro has a net margin of 19.52% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of 8.97%. Acacia Research's return on equity of -2% beat Enpro's return on equity of 5.9%.

Acacia Research has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 63.49%. On the other hand Enpro has an analysts' consensus of $222.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.89%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Enpro, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Enpro.

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro has a beta of 1.569, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.891%.

Acacia Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enpro offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Acacia Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro pays out 34.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acacia Research quarterly revenues are $124.4M, which are smaller than Enpro quarterly revenues of $273.2M. Acacia Research's net income of $24.3M is lower than Enpro's net income of $24.5M. Notably, Acacia Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.84x while Enpro's PE ratio is 48.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research is 1.65x versus 3.87x for Enpro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of 19.52% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of 2.05%. Acacia Research's return on equity of -2% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

Acacia Research has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 63.49%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -15.3%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.648%.

Acacia Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Acacia Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acacia Research quarterly revenues are $124.4M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Acacia Research's net income of $24.3M is higher than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Acacia Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.84x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 7.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research is 1.65x versus 0.15x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 19.52% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -0.71%. Acacia Research's return on equity of -2% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

Acacia Research has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 63.49%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $33.45 which suggests that it could fall by -15.71%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Symbotic.

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Acacia Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acacia Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Acacia Research quarterly revenues are $124.4M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Acacia Research's net income of $24.3M is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Acacia Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.84x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research is 1.65x versus 2.01x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.