PKOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of 5.67%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33% beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 9.74%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.3%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.32%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.246, which suggesting that the stock is 24.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.024%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 5.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $405.4M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $97M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M is higher than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 15.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.15x versus 0.83x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enpro has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of 8.97%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33% beat Enpro's return on equity of 5.9%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.3%. On the other hand Enpro has an analysts' consensus of $222.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.89%. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.246, which suggesting that the stock is 24.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro has a beta of 1.569, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.891%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Enpro offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro pays out 34.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $405.4M, which are larger than Enpro quarterly revenues of $273.2M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M is lower than Enpro's net income of $24.5M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Enpro's PE ratio is 48.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.15x versus 3.87x for Enpro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of --. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33% beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.3%. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.246, which suggesting that the stock is 24.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -4.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 550.859%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $405.4M, which are larger than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.15x versus 0.02x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of -0.71%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.3%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $33.45 which suggests that it could fall by -15.71%. Given that Symbotic has more downside risk than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Symbotic.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.246, which suggesting that the stock is 24.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $405.4M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.15x versus 2.01x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.