HI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 5.54%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $32.67, signalling upside risk potential of 44.8%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $715.9M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.52x versus 0.45x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enpro has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 8.97%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26% beat Enpro's return on equity of 5.9%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $32.67, signalling upside risk potential of 44.8%. On the other hand Enpro has an analysts' consensus of $222.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.32%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Enpro, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Enpro.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro has a beta of 1.569, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.891%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Enpro offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro pays out 34.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $715.9M, which are larger than Enpro quarterly revenues of $273.2M. Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M is lower than Enpro's net income of $24.5M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Enpro's PE ratio is 50.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.52x versus 4.00x for Enpro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 2.05%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $32.67, signalling upside risk potential of 44.8%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -17.42%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.648%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $715.9M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 8.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.52x versus 0.15x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of -0.71%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $32.67, signalling upside risk potential of 44.8%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $33.45 which suggests that it could fall by -20.75%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Symbotic.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $715.9M, which are larger than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M is lower than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.52x versus 2.14x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.