LW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conagra Brands has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 5.11%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.01, signalling upside risk potential of 18.34%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $26.20 which suggests that it could grow by 14.44%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.179, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.116%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 6.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.87x while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 33.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.25x versus 0.94x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 12.92%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.01, signalling upside risk potential of 18.34%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $61.64 which suggests that it could grow by 13.6%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.047, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.326%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.87x while General Mills's PE ratio is 11.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.25x versus 1.55x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lancaster Colony has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 8.98%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Lancaster Colony's return on equity of 17.82%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.01, signalling upside risk potential of 18.34%. On the other hand Lancaster Colony has an analysts' consensus of $194.90 which suggests that it could grow by 16.43%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Lancaster Colony, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Lancaster Colony.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.13%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Lancaster Colony offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lancaster Colony pays out 61.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Lancaster Colony quarterly revenues of $457.8M. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than Lancaster Colony's net income of $41.1M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.87x while Lancaster Colony's PE ratio is 27.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.25x versus 2.44x for Lancaster Colony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Utz Brands has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 2.13%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.98%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.01, signalling upside risk potential of 18.34%. On the other hand Utz Brands has an analysts' consensus of $17.25 which suggests that it could grow by 30.39%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Utz Brands has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.322%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Utz Brands offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Utz Brands pays out 136% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Utz Brands's is not.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Utz Brands quarterly revenues of $352.1M. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than Utz Brands's net income of $7.5M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.87x while Utz Brands's PE ratio is 41.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.25x versus 0.79x for Utz Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.