LW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conagra Brands has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 5.11%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $65.22, signalling upside risk potential of 19.02%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $25.14 which suggests that it could grow by 16.56%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.490, which suggesting that the stock is 51.048% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.174%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.66%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 6.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.49x while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 31.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.23x versus 0.88x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 12.92%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $65.22, signalling upside risk potential of 19.02%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $60.78 which suggests that it could grow by 13.48%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.490, which suggesting that the stock is 51.048% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.015, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.47%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.66%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.49x while General Mills's PE ratio is 11.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.23x versus 1.53x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lancaster Colony has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 8.98%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Lancaster Colony's return on equity of 17.82%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $65.22, signalling upside risk potential of 19.02%. On the other hand Lancaster Colony has an analysts' consensus of $194.90 which suggests that it could grow by 16.43%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Lancaster Colony, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Lancaster Colony.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.490, which suggesting that the stock is 51.048% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.467, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.335%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.66%. Lancaster Colony offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lancaster Colony pays out 61.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Lancaster Colony quarterly revenues of $457.8M. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than Lancaster Colony's net income of $41.1M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.49x while Lancaster Colony's PE ratio is 27.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.23x versus 2.44x for Lancaster Colony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Treehouse Foods has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of -4.02%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Treehouse Foods's return on equity of 0.44%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $65.22, signalling upside risk potential of 19.02%. On the other hand Treehouse Foods has an analysts' consensus of $24.56 which suggests that it could grow by 19.32%. Given that Treehouse Foods has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe Treehouse Foods is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.490, which suggesting that the stock is 51.048% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Treehouse Foods has a beta of 0.277, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.34%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.66%. Treehouse Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Treehouse Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Treehouse Foods quarterly revenues of $792M. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than Treehouse Foods's net income of -$31.8M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.49x while Treehouse Foods's PE ratio is 159.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.23x versus 0.32x for Treehouse Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.