BGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 0.2% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 9.6%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -31.47% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 36.82%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $66.01 which suggests that it could grow by 30.55%. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.446%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.91%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $425.4M, which are smaller than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. B&G Foods's net income of $835K is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 19.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.17x versus 1.14x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seneca Foods has a net margin of 0.2% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 2.92%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -31.47% beat Seneca Foods's return on equity of 6.45%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 36.82%. On the other hand Seneca Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than Seneca Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.397, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.335%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.91%. Seneca Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods pays out 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $425.4M, which are smaller than Seneca Foods quarterly revenues of $502.9M. B&G Foods's net income of $835K is lower than Seneca Foods's net income of $14.7M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seneca Foods's PE ratio is 16.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.17x versus 0.42x for Seneca Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 0.2% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of -30.3%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -31.47% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 36.82%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $121.19 which suggests that it could grow by 7.59%. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than JM Smucker.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.159%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.91%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $425.4M, which are smaller than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. B&G Foods's net income of $835K is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.17x versus 1.70x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 0.2% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 0.13%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -31.47% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 36.82%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $86.00 which suggests that it could grow by 48%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than B&G Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.39100000000001%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.91%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $425.4M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. B&G Foods's net income of $835K is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 27.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.17x versus 0.55x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.