BGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 0.2% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 9.6%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -31.47% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.61%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $66.01 which suggests that it could grow by 18.66%. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.048%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.67%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $425.4M, which are smaller than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. B&G Foods's net income of $835K is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.19x versus 1.25x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seneca Foods has a net margin of 0.2% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 2.92%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -31.47% beat Seneca Foods's return on equity of 6.45%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.61%. On the other hand Seneca Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than Seneca Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.406, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.383%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.67%. Seneca Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods pays out 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $425.4M, which are smaller than Seneca Foods quarterly revenues of $502.9M. B&G Foods's net income of $835K is lower than Seneca Foods's net income of $14.7M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seneca Foods's PE ratio is 16.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.19x versus 0.42x for Seneca Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 0.2% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of -34.01%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -31.47% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -17.05%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.61%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $115.40 which suggests that it could grow by 26.57%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than B&G Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.346, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.397%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.67%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out -37% of its earnings as a dividend.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $425.4M, which are smaller than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.1B. B&G Foods's net income of $835K is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$729M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.19x versus 1.15x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Treehouse Foods has a net margin of 0.2% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of -4.02%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -31.47% beat Treehouse Foods's return on equity of 0.44%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.61%. On the other hand Treehouse Foods has an analysts' consensus of $24.56 which suggests that it could grow by 10.96%. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than Treehouse Foods, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than Treehouse Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Treehouse Foods has a beta of 0.277, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.34%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.67%. Treehouse Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Treehouse Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $425.4M, which are smaller than Treehouse Foods quarterly revenues of $792M. B&G Foods's net income of $835K is higher than Treehouse Foods's net income of -$31.8M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Treehouse Foods's PE ratio is 171.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.19x versus 0.35x for Treehouse Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.