LHX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 7.52% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 8.13%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $258.39, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $292.63 which suggests that it could grow by 5.08%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than General Dynamics.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.716, which suggesting that the stock is 28.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.852%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.98x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 2.19x versus 1.57x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of 7.52% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 5.45%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $258.39, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $244.09 which suggests that it could grow by 9.43%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than L3Harris Technologies, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than L3Harris Technologies.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.716, which suggesting that the stock is 28.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.67%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $2.7B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M is higher than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.98x while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 16.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 2.19x versus 0.77x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 7.52% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 9.53%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $258.39, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $524.23 which suggests that it could grow by 8.68%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than L3Harris Technologies, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than L3Harris Technologies.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.716, which suggesting that the stock is 28.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.293, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.689%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.98x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 2.19x versus 1.60x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 7.52% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 7.56%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $258.39, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $138.58 which suggests that it could grow by 1.54%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than RTX.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.716, which suggesting that the stock is 28.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.563%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. RTX offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.98x while RTX's PE ratio is 40.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 2.19x versus 2.25x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.