HII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 8.13%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $246.26, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $294.61 which suggests that it could grow by 1.11%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.286, which suggesting that the stock is 71.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.91%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.28x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.82x versus 1.64x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 19.91%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $246.26, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $247.54 which suggests that it could fall by -1.38%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.286, which suggesting that the stock is 71.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.852%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.28x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 39.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.82x versus 6.89x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 7.52%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $246.26, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $261.74 which suggests that it could grow by 6.05%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.286, which suggesting that the stock is 71.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.701%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.28x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 29.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.82x versus 2.21x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 9.53%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $246.26, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $527.76 which suggests that it could grow by 15.26%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.286, which suggesting that the stock is 71.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.292, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.819%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.28x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 19.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.82x versus 1.52x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.