GD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 8.13% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 19.91%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $292.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.52%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $223.74 which suggests that it could grow by 4.31%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.227%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $12.2B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. General Dynamics's net income of $994M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.86x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 33.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.54x versus 5.89x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 8.13% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 7.52%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $292.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.52%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $256.89 which suggests that it could grow by 17.63%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.716, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.36%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $12.2B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.1B. General Dynamics's net income of $994M is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.86x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.54x versus 1.96x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 8.13% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 9.53%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $292.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.52%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $524.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.43%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.293, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.689%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $12.2B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. General Dynamics's net income of $994M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.86x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.54x versus 1.57x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 8.13% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 7.56%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $292.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.52%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $137.93 which suggests that it could grow by 7.2%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than RTX.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.563%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. RTX offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $12.2B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. General Dynamics's net income of $994M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.86x while RTX's PE ratio is 37.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.54x versus 2.12x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.