BA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of -0.19% compared to Boeing's net margin of 19.91%. Boeing's return on equity of -- beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

Boeing has a consensus price target of $196.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.05%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $223.74 which suggests that it could grow by 6.59%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Boeing.

Boeing has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.227%.

Boeing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Boeing pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boeing quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Boeing's net income of -$37M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, Boeing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 32.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boeing is 1.82x versus 5.76x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of -0.19% compared to Boeing's net margin of 9.53%. Boeing's return on equity of -- beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

Boeing has a consensus price target of $196.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.05%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.53 which suggests that it could grow by 11.08%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Boeing.

Boeing has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.293, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.689%.

Boeing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Boeing pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boeing quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. Boeing's net income of -$37M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Boeing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boeing is 1.82x versus 1.56x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Textron has a net margin of -0.19% compared to Boeing's net margin of 6.26%. Boeing's return on equity of -- beat Textron's return on equity of 11.79%.

Boeing has a consensus price target of $196.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.05%. On the other hand Textron has an analysts' consensus of $84.10 which suggests that it could grow by 20.14%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Boeing.

Boeing has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Textron has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.211%.

Boeing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Textron offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Boeing pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Textron pays out 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boeing quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Textron quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Boeing's net income of -$37M is lower than Textron's net income of $207M. Notably, Boeing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Textron's PE ratio is 15.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boeing is 1.82x versus 0.95x for Textron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of -0.19% compared to Boeing's net margin of 12.33%. Boeing's return on equity of -- beat Woodward's return on equity of 17.01%.

Boeing has a consensus price target of $196.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.05%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $205.23 which suggests that it could grow by 5.68%. Given that Boeing has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Boeing is more attractive than Woodward.

Boeing has a beta of 1.406, which suggesting that the stock is 40.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.62%.

Boeing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Boeing pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boeing quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Woodward quarterly revenues of $883.6M. Boeing's net income of -$37M is lower than Woodward's net income of $108.9M. Notably, Boeing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Woodward's PE ratio is 31.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boeing is 1.82x versus 3.56x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.