KRP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Houston American Energy has a net margin of 25.55% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net margin of -1008.83%. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's return on equity of 2.83% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a consensus price target of $17.40, signalling upside risk potential of 22.8%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a beta of 0.509, which suggesting that the stock is 49.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.608%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 12%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP pays 1527.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP quarterly revenues are $90.3M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $102.4K. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net income of $23.1M is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M. Notably, Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 283.40x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is 5.39x versus 25.73x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of 25.55% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net margin of 24.81%. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's return on equity of 2.83% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a consensus price target of $17.40, signalling upside risk potential of 22.8%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a beta of 0.509, which suggesting that the stock is 49.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.526%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 12%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP pays 1527.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's is not.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP quarterly revenues are $90.3M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net income of $23.1M is higher than Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K. Notably, Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 283.40x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 9.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is 5.39x versus 2.29x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of 25.55% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net margin of 11.52%. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's return on equity of 2.83% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a consensus price target of $17.40, signalling upside risk potential of 22.8%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $2.99 which suggests that it could grow by 296.94%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a beta of 0.509, which suggesting that the stock is 49.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.407%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 12%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP pays 1527.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP quarterly revenues are $90.3M, which are larger than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $79.1M. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net income of $23.1M is higher than Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 283.40x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is 5.39x versus 0.43x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riley Exploration Permian has a net margin of 25.55% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net margin of 27.95%. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's return on equity of 2.83% beat Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 19.96%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a consensus price target of $17.40, signalling upside risk potential of 22.8%. On the other hand Riley Exploration Permian has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 105.55%. Given that Riley Exploration Permian has higher upside potential than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian is more attractive than Kimbell Royalty Partners LP.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a beta of 0.509, which suggesting that the stock is 49.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.172%.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 12%. Riley Exploration Permian offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP pays 1527.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian pays out 34.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's is not.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP quarterly revenues are $90.3M, which are smaller than Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues of $102.5M. Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's net income of $23.1M is lower than Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Kimbell Royalty Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 283.40x while Riley Exploration Permian's PE ratio is 5.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimbell Royalty Partners LP is 5.39x versus 1.30x for Riley Exploration Permian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.