REPX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Houston American Energy has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Riley Exploration Permian's net margin of -111.16%. Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 25.88% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -32.89%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.34%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Riley Exploration Permian has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.071% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.938%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riley Exploration Permian pays 24.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues are $102.3M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $130.2K. Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $25.7M is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$144.8K. Notably, Riley Exploration Permian's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.49x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riley Exploration Permian is 1.56x versus 21.12x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Riley Exploration Permian's net margin of 18.13%. Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 25.88% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 6.97%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.34%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Riley Exploration Permian has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.071% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.786%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Riley Exploration Permian pays 24.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues are $102.3M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $25.7M is higher than Mexco Energy's net income of $317.2K. Notably, Riley Exploration Permian's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.49x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 19.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riley Exploration Permian is 1.56x versus 3.39x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PEDEVCO has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Riley Exploration Permian's net margin of 32.21%. Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 25.88% beat PEDEVCO's return on equity of 2.3%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.34%. On the other hand PEDEVCO has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 143.24%. Given that PEDEVCO has higher upside potential than Riley Exploration Permian, analysts believe PEDEVCO is more attractive than Riley Exploration Permian.

Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.071% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PEDEVCO has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.63%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. PEDEVCO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riley Exploration Permian pays 24.83% of its earnings as a dividend. PEDEVCO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues are $102.3M, which are larger than PEDEVCO quarterly revenues of $9.1M. Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $25.7M is higher than PEDEVCO's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Riley Exploration Permian's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.49x while PEDEVCO's PE ratio is 32.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riley Exploration Permian is 1.56x versus 1.84x for PEDEVCO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Riley Exploration Permian's net margin of 37.96%. Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 25.88% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 14.15%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.34%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Riley Exploration Permian, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Riley Exploration Permian.

Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.071% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.413%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riley Exploration Permian pays 24.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues are $102.3M, which are larger than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $89.2M. Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $25.7M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Riley Exploration Permian's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.49x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riley Exploration Permian is 1.56x versus 0.67x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.