REI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 25.04%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 20.78%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of $3.47, signalling upside risk potential of 356.04%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $141.05 which suggests that it could grow by 16.88%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than EOG Resources.

Ring Energy has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.354%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $79.1M, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 11.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.44x versus 2.90x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SandRidge Energy has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 30.63%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47% beat SandRidge Energy's return on equity of 14.64%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of $3.47, signalling upside risk potential of 356.04%. On the other hand SandRidge Energy has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.84%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than SandRidge Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than SandRidge Energy.

Ring Energy has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SandRidge Energy has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.59%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SandRidge Energy offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SandRidge Energy pays out 114.85% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $79.1M, which are larger than SandRidge Energy quarterly revenues of $42.6M. Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M is lower than SandRidge Energy's net income of $13M. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while SandRidge Energy's PE ratio is 6.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.44x versus 3.05x for SandRidge Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 21.71%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of $3.47, signalling upside risk potential of 356.04%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $39.69 which suggests that it could grow by 55.18%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than SM Energy.

Ring Energy has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 2.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.967%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $79.1M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $839.6M. Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $182.3M. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.44x versus 0.98x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vitesse Energy has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 4.03%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47% beat Vitesse Energy's return on equity of 4.75%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of $3.47, signalling upside risk potential of 356.04%. On the other hand Vitesse Energy has an analysts' consensus of $25.60 which suggests that it could grow by 10.3%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Vitesse Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Vitesse Energy.

Ring Energy has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vitesse Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vitesse Energy offers a yield of 9.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vitesse Energy pays out 301.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $79.1M, which are larger than Vitesse Energy quarterly revenues of $66.2M. Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M is higher than Vitesse Energy's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while Vitesse Energy's PE ratio is 30.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.44x versus 3.15x for Vitesse Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.