HUSA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comstock Resources has a net margin of -1008.83% compared to Houston American Energy's net margin of -23.65%. Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52% beat Comstock Resources's return on equity of -13.7%.

Houston American Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comstock Resources has an analysts' consensus of $21.71 which suggests that it could fall by -12.62%. Given that Comstock Resources has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Comstock Resources is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.539%.

Houston American Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comstock Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Houston American Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Houston American Energy quarterly revenues are $102.4K, which are smaller than Comstock Resources quarterly revenues of $512.9M. Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M is higher than Comstock Resources's net income of -$121.3M. Notably, Houston American Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comstock Resources's PE ratio is 44.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Houston American Energy is 24.66x versus 5.04x for Comstock Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -1008.83% compared to Houston American Energy's net margin of 34.86%. Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Houston American Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.90 which suggests that it could grow by 28.83%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.052%.

Houston American Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Houston American Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Houston American Energy quarterly revenues are $102.4K, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Houston American Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Houston American Energy is 24.66x versus 2.67x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of -1008.83% compared to Houston American Energy's net margin of 24.81%. Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6%.

Houston American Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Houston American Energy has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Houston American Energy is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.526%.

Houston American Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Houston American Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Houston American Energy quarterly revenues are $102.4K, which are smaller than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M is lower than Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K. Notably, Houston American Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 11.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Houston American Energy is 24.66x versus 2.64x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of -1008.83% compared to Houston American Energy's net margin of -3.68%. Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52% beat Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49%.

Houston American Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.44 which suggests that it could grow by 23.68%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 1.597, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.665%.

Houston American Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Houston American Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Houston American Energy quarterly revenues are $102.4K, which are smaller than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $512.2M. Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M is higher than Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Houston American Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Houston American Energy is 24.66x versus 0.31x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.