PSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Parsons's net margin of 8.69%. Parsons's return on equity of 3.39% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $121.71, signalling upside risk potential of 30.27%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $192.17 which suggests that it could grow by 32%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.399% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.637, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.266%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Parsons's net income of $72M is lower than Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 141.56x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 16.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.59x versus 1.23x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Parsons's net margin of 5.36%. Parsons's return on equity of 3.39% beat Science Applications International's return on equity of 17.6%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $121.71, signalling upside risk potential of 30.27%. On the other hand Science Applications International has an analysts' consensus of $137.11 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Parsons has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.399% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Science Applications International has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.41%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Science Applications International offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 16.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Science Applications International quarterly revenues of $2B. Parsons's net income of $72M is lower than Science Applications International's net income of $106M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 141.56x while Science Applications International's PE ratio is 18.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.59x versus 0.78x for Science Applications International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Parsons's net margin of -2893.73%. Parsons's return on equity of 3.39% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $121.71, signalling upside risk potential of 30.27%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Parsons has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.399% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -14.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Parsons's net income of $72M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 141.56x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.59x versus 1.62x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Parsons's net margin of -1.23%. Parsons's return on equity of 3.39% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $121.71, signalling upside risk potential of 30.27%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.4%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.399% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.645%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Parsons's net income of $72M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 141.56x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.59x versus 0.31x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.