FPI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innovative Industrial Properties has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Farmland Partners's net margin of 52.55%. Farmland Partners's return on equity of 2.95% beat Innovative Industrial Properties's return on equity of 8.37%.

Farmland Partners has a consensus price target of $13.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.73%. On the other hand Innovative Industrial Properties has an analysts' consensus of $109.50 which suggests that it could grow by 55.43%. Given that Innovative Industrial Properties has higher upside potential than Farmland Partners, analysts believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more attractive than Farmland Partners.

Farmland Partners has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.919% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.455%.

Farmland Partners has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Innovative Industrial Properties offers a yield of 10.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Farmland Partners pays 50.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 123.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Farmland Partners's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Innovative Industrial Properties's is not.

Farmland Partners quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than Innovative Industrial Properties quarterly revenues of $76.5M. Farmland Partners's net income of $1.8M is lower than Innovative Industrial Properties's net income of $40.2M. Notably, Farmland Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.14x while Innovative Industrial Properties's PE ratio is 12.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Farmland Partners is 10.75x versus 6.45x for Innovative Industrial Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Farmland Partners's net margin of 14.43%. Farmland Partners's return on equity of 2.95% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.35%.

Farmland Partners has a consensus price target of $13.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.73%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 17.2%. Given that Invitation Homes has higher upside potential than Farmland Partners, analysts believe Invitation Homes is more attractive than Farmland Partners.

Farmland Partners has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.919% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.488%.

Farmland Partners has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Farmland Partners pays 50.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 122.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Farmland Partners's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Invitation Homes's is not.

Farmland Partners quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $660.3M. Farmland Partners's net income of $1.8M is lower than Invitation Homes's net income of $95.3M. Notably, Farmland Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.14x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 45.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Farmland Partners is 10.75x versus 7.65x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Farmland Partners's net margin of 26.14%. Farmland Partners's return on equity of 2.95% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 42.69%.

Farmland Partners has a consensus price target of $13.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.73%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $133.95 which suggests that it could grow by 8.46%. Given that Farmland Partners has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Farmland Partners is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Farmland Partners has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.919% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.271%.

Farmland Partners has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 4.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.65 per share. Farmland Partners pays 50.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 103% of its earnings as a dividend. Farmland Partners's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Lamar Advertising's is not.

Farmland Partners quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $564.1M. Farmland Partners's net income of $1.8M is lower than Lamar Advertising's net income of $147.5M. Notably, Farmland Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.14x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 24.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Farmland Partners is 10.75x versus 5.80x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Farmland Partners's net margin of 1.3%. Farmland Partners's return on equity of 2.95% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 0.77%.

Farmland Partners has a consensus price target of $13.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.73%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $51.71 which suggests that it could grow by 28.49%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Farmland Partners, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Farmland Partners.

Farmland Partners has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.919% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.835%.

Farmland Partners has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Farmland Partners pays 50.09% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 231.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Farmland Partners's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PotlatchDeltic's is not.

Farmland Partners quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $255.1M. Farmland Partners's net income of $1.8M is lower than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Farmland Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.14x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 193.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Farmland Partners is 10.75x versus 2.98x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.