CXM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of -0.76% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of -9.99%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 19.34% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61%.

Sprinklr has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.71%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $472.45 which suggests that it could fall by -4.38%. Given that Sprinklr has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Sprinklr is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.225%.

Sprinklr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr quarterly revenues are $205.5M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Sprinklr's net income of -$1.6M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M. Notably, Sprinklr's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.05x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr is 2.71x versus 29.63x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Guidewire Software has a net margin of -0.76% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 15.67%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 19.34% beat Guidewire Software's return on equity of 2.65%.

Sprinklr has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.71%. On the other hand Guidewire Software has an analysts' consensus of $242.41 which suggests that it could grow by 2.09%. Given that Sprinklr has higher upside potential than Guidewire Software, analysts believe Sprinklr is more attractive than Guidewire Software.

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guidewire Software has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.393%.

Sprinklr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guidewire Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guidewire Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr quarterly revenues are $205.5M, which are smaller than Guidewire Software quarterly revenues of $293.5M. Sprinklr's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Guidewire Software's net income of $46M. Notably, Sprinklr's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.05x while Guidewire Software's PE ratio is 593.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr is 2.71x versus 17.66x for Guidewire Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -0.76% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of -4.72%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 19.34% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Sprinklr has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.71%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 294.39%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Sprinklr, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Sprinklr.

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.556, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.648%.

Sprinklr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprinklr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprinklr quarterly revenues are $205.5M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Sprinklr's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Sprinklr's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.05x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr is 2.71x versus 0.56x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SS&C Technologies Holdings has a net margin of -0.76% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 14.07%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 19.34% beat SS&C Technologies Holdings's return on equity of 12.24%.

Sprinklr has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.71%. On the other hand SS&C Technologies Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $92.77 which suggests that it could grow by 13.92%. Given that Sprinklr has higher upside potential than SS&C Technologies Holdings, analysts believe Sprinklr is more attractive than SS&C Technologies Holdings.

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SS&C Technologies Holdings has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.081%.

Sprinklr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SS&C Technologies Holdings offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Sprinklr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SS&C Technologies Holdings pays out 32.2% of its earnings as a dividend. SS&C Technologies Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprinklr quarterly revenues are $205.5M, which are smaller than SS&C Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Sprinklr's net income of -$1.6M is lower than SS&C Technologies Holdings's net income of $213M. Notably, Sprinklr's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.05x while SS&C Technologies Holdings's PE ratio is 25.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprinklr is 2.71x versus 3.47x for SS&C Technologies Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.