CRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 12.78% compared to California Resources's net margin of 34.86%. California Resources's return on equity of 17.04% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $56.75, signalling upside risk potential of 26.06%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.94 which suggests that it could grow by 32.53%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than California Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.189%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $900M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. California Resources's net income of $115M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.17x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.17x versus 2.59x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Houston American Energy has a net margin of 12.78% compared to California Resources's net margin of -1008.83%. California Resources's return on equity of 17.04% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $56.75, signalling upside risk potential of 26.06%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.386, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.364%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $900M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $102.4K. California Resources's net income of $115M is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.17x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.17x versus 29.61x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talos Energy has a net margin of 12.78% compared to California Resources's net margin of -1.92%. California Resources's return on equity of 17.04% beat Talos Energy's return on equity of 0.95%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $56.75, signalling upside risk potential of 26.06%. On the other hand Talos Energy has an analysts' consensus of $13.17 which suggests that it could grow by 56.37%. Given that Talos Energy has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Talos Energy is more attractive than California Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talos Energy has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.036%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Talos Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Talos Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $900M, which are larger than Talos Energy quarterly revenues of $513.1M. California Resources's net income of $115M is higher than Talos Energy's net income of -$9.9M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.17x while Talos Energy's PE ratio is 56.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.17x versus 0.74x for Talos Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of 12.78% compared to California Resources's net margin of -3.68%. California Resources's return on equity of 17.04% beat Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $56.75, signalling upside risk potential of 26.06%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.44 which suggests that it could grow by 22.2%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Vital Energy.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 1.587, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.667%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $900M, which are larger than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $512.2M. California Resources's net income of $115M is higher than Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.17x while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.17x versus 0.32x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.