FANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 11.1%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 20.2%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $181.62, signalling upside risk potential of 21.62%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $42.89 which suggests that it could grow by 24.95%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.274%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is higher than Devon Energy's net income of $494M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 7.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.81x versus 1.30x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 25.04%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 20.78%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $181.62, signalling upside risk potential of 21.62%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $139.26 which suggests that it could grow by 15.49%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than EOG Resources.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.354%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 11.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.81x versus 2.90x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 13.76%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.25%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $181.62, signalling upside risk potential of 21.62%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $49.54 which suggests that it could grow by 10.68%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.313%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $936M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 18.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.81x versus 1.58x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sitio Royalties has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 6.28%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Sitio Royalties's return on equity of 1.26%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $181.62, signalling upside risk potential of 21.62%. On the other hand Sitio Royalties has an analysts' consensus of $25.60 which suggests that it could grow by 28.32%. Given that Sitio Royalties has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Sitio Royalties is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sitio Royalties has a beta of 1.412, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.221%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Sitio Royalties offers a yield of 6.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Sitio Royalties pays out 296.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sitio Royalties's is not.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Sitio Royalties quarterly revenues of $163.5M. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is higher than Sitio Royalties's net income of $10.3M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Sitio Royalties's PE ratio is 39.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.81x versus 2.50x for Sitio Royalties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.