VTLE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

APA has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 13.16%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat APA's return on equity of 17.49%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.60, signalling upside risk potential of 2.23%. On the other hand APA has an analysts' consensus of $22.63 which suggests that it could grow by 7.73%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 1.587, which suggesting that the stock is 58.667% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison APA has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.397%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. APA offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. APA pays out 43.91% of its earnings as a dividend. APA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than APA quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than APA's net income of $347M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while APA's PE ratio is 7.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.38x versus 0.74x for APA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Civitas Resources has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 15.6%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat Civitas Resources's return on equity of 12.78%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.60, signalling upside risk potential of 2.23%. On the other hand Civitas Resources has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.94%. Given that Civitas Resources has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe Civitas Resources is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 1.587, which suggesting that the stock is 58.667% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Civitas Resources has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.263%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Civitas Resources offers a yield of 9.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Civitas Resources pays out 58.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Civitas Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than Civitas Resources quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Civitas Resources's net income of $186M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Civitas Resources's PE ratio is 3.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.38x versus 0.64x for Civitas Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

California Resources has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 12.78%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat California Resources's return on equity of 17.04%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.60, signalling upside risk potential of 2.23%. On the other hand California Resources has an analysts' consensus of $56.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.53%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 1.587, which suggesting that the stock is 58.667% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California Resources offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources pays out 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than California Resources quarterly revenues of $900M. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than California Resources's net income of $115M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while California Resources's PE ratio is 8.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.38x versus 1.23x for California Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 34.86%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.60, signalling upside risk potential of 2.23%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $181.84 which suggests that it could grow by 17.39%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 1.587, which suggesting that the stock is 58.667% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.189%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.38x versus 2.91x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.