Financhill
Sell
24

VTLE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$15.04
Seasonality move :
-5.25%
Day range:
$14.95 - $15.67
52-week range:
$12.30 - $49.06
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
2.46x
P/S ratio:
0.29x
P/B ratio:
0.22x
Volume:
602.5K
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
-67.99%
Market cap:
$592.4M
Revenue:
$2B
EPS (TTM):
-$3.38

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
VTLE
Vital Energy
$530.4M $2.12 1.02% 86.38% $20.60
AMPY
Amplify Energy
$73.9M $0.16 -9.85% 2.94% $10.25
APA
APA
$2.2B $0.82 -19.17% -60.62% $22.56
CIVI
Civitas Resources
$1.2B $1.65 -16.78% -46.39% $42.21
CRC
California Resources
$861.6M $0.77 61.8% 724.73% $55.67
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$3.8B $4.20 35.5% -35.84% $181.77
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
VTLE
Vital Energy
$15.28 $20.60 $592.4M 2.46x $0.00 0% 0.29x
AMPY
Amplify Energy
$2.81 $10.25 $113.3M 7.59x $0.00 0% 0.39x
APA
APA
$17.34 $22.56 $6.3B 6.24x $0.25 5.77% 0.61x
CIVI
Civitas Resources
$28.40 $42.21 $2.6B 3.26x $0.50 14.16% 0.55x
CRC
California Resources
$42.69 $55.67 $3.8B 7.75x $0.39 3.45% 1.11x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$137.81 $181.77 $40.3B 8.43x $1.00 3.8% 2.59x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
VTLE
Vital Energy
46.27% 2.048 281.31% 0.47x
AMPY
Amplify Energy
23.68% 1.731 82.86% 0.46x
APA
APA
49.69% -0.261 62.24% 0.68x
CIVI
Civitas Resources
43.18% 1.681 157.76% 0.41x
CRC
California Resources
22.32% 1.311 25.76% 0.67x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
26.55% 0.334 28.27% 0.72x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
VTLE
Vital Energy
$178.8M $144.1M -2.52% -4.49% 5.95% $117.9M
AMPY
Amplify Energy
$21.9M $4.5M 3.17% 4.13% -5.38% $289K
APA
APA
$1B $773M 8.66% 17.49% 32.25% $306M
CIVI
Civitas Resources
$472M $410M 7.45% 12.78% 29.36% $227M
CRC
California Resources
$393M $168M 12.73% 17.04% 21% $186M
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$1.8B $1.7B 9.23% 12.66% 47.98% $663M

Vital Energy vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns VTLE or AMPY?

    Amplify Energy has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of -8.14%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat Amplify Energy's return on equity of 4.13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    34.91% -$0.50 $5B
    AMPY
    Amplify Energy
    30.33% -$0.15 $527.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About VTLE or AMPY?

    Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.60, signalling upside risk potential of 34.82%. On the other hand Amplify Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.25 which suggests that it could grow by 264.77%. Given that Amplify Energy has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe Amplify Energy is more attractive than Vital Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    1 8 0
    AMPY
    Amplify Energy
    1 0 0
  • Is VTLE or AMPY More Risky?

    Vital Energy has a beta of 1.526, which suggesting that the stock is 52.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Energy has a beta of 0.368, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.175%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VTLE or AMPY?

    Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amplify Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VTLE or AMPY?

    Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are larger than Amplify Energy quarterly revenues of $72.1M. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Amplify Energy's net income of -$5.9M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Amplify Energy's PE ratio is 7.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.29x versus 0.39x for Amplify Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    0.29x 2.46x $512.2M -$18.8M
    AMPY
    Amplify Energy
    0.39x 7.59x $72.1M -$5.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns VTLE or APA?

    APA has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 13.16%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat APA's return on equity of 17.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    34.91% -$0.50 $5B
    APA
    APA
    38.24% $0.96 $11.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About VTLE or APA?

    Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.60, signalling upside risk potential of 34.82%. On the other hand APA has an analysts' consensus of $22.56 which suggests that it could grow by 30.11%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than APA, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than APA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    1 8 0
    APA
    APA
    4 17 3
  • Is VTLE or APA More Risky?

    Vital Energy has a beta of 1.526, which suggesting that the stock is 52.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison APA has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.515%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VTLE or APA?

    Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. APA offers a yield of 5.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. APA pays out 43.91% of its earnings as a dividend. APA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VTLE or APA?

    Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than APA quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than APA's net income of $347M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while APA's PE ratio is 6.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.29x versus 0.61x for APA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    0.29x 2.46x $512.2M -$18.8M
    APA
    APA
    0.61x 6.24x $2.6B $347M
  • Which has Higher Returns VTLE or CIVI?

    Civitas Resources has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 15.6%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat Civitas Resources's return on equity of 12.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    34.91% -$0.50 $5B
    CIVI
    Civitas Resources
    39.6% $1.99 $11.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About VTLE or CIVI?

    Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.60, signalling upside risk potential of 34.82%. On the other hand Civitas Resources has an analysts' consensus of $42.21 which suggests that it could grow by 48.64%. Given that Civitas Resources has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe Civitas Resources is more attractive than Vital Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    1 8 0
    CIVI
    Civitas Resources
    5 7 0
  • Is VTLE or CIVI More Risky?

    Vital Energy has a beta of 1.526, which suggesting that the stock is 52.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Civitas Resources has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.602%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VTLE or CIVI?

    Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Civitas Resources offers a yield of 14.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Civitas Resources pays out 58.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Civitas Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VTLE or CIVI?

    Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than Civitas Resources quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Civitas Resources's net income of $186M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Civitas Resources's PE ratio is 3.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.29x versus 0.55x for Civitas Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    0.29x 2.46x $512.2M -$18.8M
    CIVI
    Civitas Resources
    0.55x 3.26x $1.2B $186M
  • Which has Higher Returns VTLE or CRC?

    California Resources has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 12.78%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat California Resources's return on equity of 17.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    34.91% -$0.50 $5B
    CRC
    California Resources
    43.67% $1.26 $4.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About VTLE or CRC?

    Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.60, signalling upside risk potential of 34.82%. On the other hand California Resources has an analysts' consensus of $55.67 which suggests that it could grow by 30.4%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than California Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    1 8 0
    CRC
    California Resources
    7 3 0
  • Is VTLE or CRC More Risky?

    Vital Energy has a beta of 1.526, which suggesting that the stock is 52.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VTLE or CRC?

    Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California Resources offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources pays out 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VTLE or CRC?

    Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than California Resources quarterly revenues of $900M. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than California Resources's net income of $115M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while California Resources's PE ratio is 7.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.29x versus 1.11x for California Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    0.29x 2.46x $512.2M -$18.8M
    CRC
    California Resources
    1.11x 7.75x $900M $115M
  • Which has Higher Returns VTLE or FANG?

    Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 34.86%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    34.91% -$0.50 $5B
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    45% $4.83 $55.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About VTLE or FANG?

    Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.60, signalling upside risk potential of 34.82%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $181.77 which suggests that it could grow by 31.9%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    1 8 0
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    16 3 0
  • Is VTLE or FANG More Risky?

    Vital Energy has a beta of 1.526, which suggesting that the stock is 52.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VTLE or FANG?

    Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VTLE or FANG?

    Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.29x versus 2.59x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    0.29x 2.46x $512.2M -$18.8M
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.59x 8.43x $4B $1.4B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?

So you’re looking at Dell (NASDAQ: DELL) and wondering, “Is…

Where Will Cameco Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Cameco Stock Be in 5 Years?

Cameco (NYSE: CCJ) isn’t exactly the kind of stock you…

Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth
Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) has been among the top growth stocks of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 47x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
84
SBET alert for May 30

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is up 9.23% over the past day.

Buy
55
RGC alert for May 30

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 24.83% over the past day.

Buy
73
CTEV alert for May 30

Claritev [CTEV] is up 6.15% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock