BKH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Fortress Energy has a net margin of 6.08% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 1.64%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.51% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity of 11.23%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $60.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.92%. On the other hand New Fortress Energy has an analysts' consensus of $19.63 which suggests that it could grow by 35.44%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.608, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.834%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. New Fortress Energy offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Black Hills pays 64.11% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy pays out 132.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but New Fortress Energy's is not.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $401.6M, which are smaller than New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues of $567.5M. Black Hills's net income of $24.4M is higher than New Fortress Energy's net income of $9.3M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while New Fortress Energy's PE ratio is 15.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.92x versus 1.22x for New Fortress Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 6.08% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 5.92%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.51% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 3.38%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $60.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.92%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $9.20 which suggests that it could grow by 128.11%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Black Hills pays 64.11% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 55.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $401.6M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $84M. Black Hills's net income of $24.4M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $5M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 18.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.92x versus 0.29x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 6.08% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 1.08%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.51% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.06%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $60.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.92%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.4%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.169, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.111%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Black Hills pays 64.11% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $401.6M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $13.1M. Black Hills's net income of $24.4M is higher than RGC Resources's net income of $140.8K. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.92x versus 2.41x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UGI has a net margin of 6.08% compared to Black Hills's net margin of -21.98%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.51% beat UGI's return on equity of 5.93%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $60.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.92%. On the other hand UGI has an analysts' consensus of $33.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.03%. Given that UGI has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe UGI is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UGI has a beta of 1.213, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.269%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. UGI offers a yield of 5.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Black Hills pays 64.11% of its earnings as a dividend. UGI pays out 118.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UGI's is not.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $401.6M, which are smaller than UGI quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Black Hills's net income of $24.4M is higher than UGI's net income of -$273M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while UGI's PE ratio is 22.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.92x versus 0.83x for UGI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.