OPAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Black Hills has a net margin of 2.79% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 16.68%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.41% beat Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 78.25%. On the other hand Black Hills has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.28%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Black Hills.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Hills has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.462%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Black Hills offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills pays out 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $85.4M, which are smaller than Black Hills quarterly revenues of $805.2M. OPAL Fuels's net income of $2.4M is lower than Black Hills's net income of $134.3M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 136.75x while Black Hills's PE ratio is 14.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.24x versus 1.82x for Black Hills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 2.79% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 17.04%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.41% beat Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.13%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 78.25%. On the other hand Chesapeake Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $136.67 which suggests that it could grow by 10.11%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Utilities, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Chesapeake Utilities.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.768%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chesapeake Utilities offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $85.4M, which are smaller than Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues of $298.7M. OPAL Fuels's net income of $2.4M is lower than Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $50.9M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 136.75x while Chesapeake Utilities's PE ratio is 22.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.24x versus 3.36x for Chesapeake Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 2.79% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 21.05%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.41% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.89%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 78.25%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.73%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than RGC Resources.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.158%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $85.4M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $36.5M. OPAL Fuels's net income of $2.4M is lower than RGC Resources's net income of $7.7M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 136.75x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.24x versus 2.55x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 2.79% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 24.12%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.41% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.15%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 78.25%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $80.86 which suggests that it could grow by 5.92%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Sempra.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.575%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $85.4M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. OPAL Fuels's net income of $2.4M is lower than Sempra's net income of $917M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 136.75x while Sempra's PE ratio is 16.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.24x versus 3.66x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.