RGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Black Hills has a net margin of 21.05% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 16.68%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.89% beat Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.73%. On the other hand Black Hills has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.68%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Black Hills.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.428, which suggesting that the stock is 57.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Hills has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.462%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Black Hills offers a yield of 4.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills pays out 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $36.5M, which are smaller than Black Hills quarterly revenues of $805.2M. RGC Resources's net income of $7.7M is lower than Black Hills's net income of $134.3M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.77x while Black Hills's PE ratio is 14.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.55x versus 1.79x for Black Hills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 21.05% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 17.04%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.89% beat Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.13%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.73%. On the other hand Chesapeake Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $136.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.61%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Utilities, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Chesapeake Utilities.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.428, which suggesting that the stock is 57.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.768%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Chesapeake Utilities offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $36.5M, which are smaller than Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues of $298.7M. RGC Resources's net income of $7.7M is lower than Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $50.9M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.77x while Chesapeake Utilities's PE ratio is 22.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.55x versus 3.25x for Chesapeake Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 21.05% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 2.79%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.89% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.41%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.73%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.88 which suggests that it could grow by 78.25%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than RGC Resources.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.428, which suggesting that the stock is 57.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $36.5M, which are smaller than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $85.4M. RGC Resources's net income of $7.7M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $2.4M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.77x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 136.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.55x versus 0.24x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 21.05% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 24.12%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.89% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.15%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.73%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $80.86 which suggests that it could grow by 5.92%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Sempra.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.428, which suggesting that the stock is 57.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.575%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $36.5M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. RGC Resources's net income of $7.7M is lower than Sempra's net income of $917M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.77x while Sempra's PE ratio is 16.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.55x versus 3.66x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.