CPK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Jersey Resources has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Chesapeake Utilities's net margin of 22.38%. Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.13% beat New Jersey Resources's return on equity of 18.35%.

Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus price target of $136.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.79%. On the other hand New Jersey Resources has an analysts' consensus of $53.71 which suggests that it could grow by 19.95%. Given that New Jersey Resources has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Utilities, analysts believe New Jersey Resources is more attractive than Chesapeake Utilities.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Jersey Resources has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.275%.

Chesapeake Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. New Jersey Resources offers a yield of 4.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Chesapeake Utilities pays 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. New Jersey Resources pays out 56.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues are $298.7M, which are smaller than New Jersey Resources quarterly revenues of $913M. Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $50.9M is lower than New Jersey Resources's net income of $204.3M. Notably, Chesapeake Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.20x while New Jersey Resources's PE ratio is 10.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chesapeake Utilities is 3.25x versus 2.16x for New Jersey Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northwest Natural Holding has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Chesapeake Utilities's net margin of 17.79%. Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.13% beat Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 7.47%.

Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus price target of $136.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.79%. On the other hand Northwest Natural Holding has an analysts' consensus of $49.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.53%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Utilities, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than Chesapeake Utilities.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.540, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.005%.

Chesapeake Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Northwest Natural Holding offers a yield of 4.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Chesapeake Utilities pays 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Northwest Natural Holding pays out 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues are $298.7M, which are smaller than Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues of $494.3M. Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $50.9M is lower than Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $87.9M. Notably, Chesapeake Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.20x while Northwest Natural Holding's PE ratio is 15.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chesapeake Utilities is 3.25x versus 1.30x for Northwest Natural Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spire has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Chesapeake Utilities's net margin of 19.91%. Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.13% beat Spire's return on equity of 7.51%.

Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus price target of $136.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.79%. On the other hand Spire has an analysts' consensus of $78.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.73%. Given that Chesapeake Utilities has higher upside potential than Spire, analysts believe Chesapeake Utilities is more attractive than Spire.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spire has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.613%.

Chesapeake Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Spire offers a yield of 4.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Chesapeake Utilities pays 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Spire pays out 72.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues are $298.7M, which are smaller than Spire quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $50.9M is lower than Spire's net income of $209.3M. Notably, Chesapeake Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.20x while Spire's PE ratio is 18.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chesapeake Utilities is 3.25x versus 1.75x for Spire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southwest Gas Holdings has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Chesapeake Utilities's net margin of 8.78%. Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.13% beat Southwest Gas Holdings's return on equity of 6.21%.

Chesapeake Utilities has a consensus price target of $136.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.79%. On the other hand Southwest Gas Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $77.57 which suggests that it could grow by 8.16%. Given that Chesapeake Utilities has higher upside potential than Southwest Gas Holdings, analysts believe Chesapeake Utilities is more attractive than Southwest Gas Holdings.

Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southwest Gas Holdings has a beta of 0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.081%.

Chesapeake Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Southwest Gas Holdings offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Chesapeake Utilities pays 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Southwest Gas Holdings pays out 89.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues are $298.7M, which are smaller than Southwest Gas Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $50.9M is lower than Southwest Gas Holdings's net income of $113.9M. Notably, Chesapeake Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.20x while Southwest Gas Holdings's PE ratio is 23.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chesapeake Utilities is 3.25x versus 1.07x for Southwest Gas Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.