AVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DTE Energy has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 10.02%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat DTE Energy's return on equity of 13.35%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.49%. On the other hand DTE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $141.10 which suggests that it could grow by 7.82%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than DTE Energy, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than DTE Energy.

Avista has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 58.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DTE Energy has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.907%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. DTE Energy offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. DTE Energy pays out 57.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than DTE Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Avista's net income of $79M is lower than DTE Energy's net income of $445M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.98x while DTE Energy's PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.53x versus 1.98x for DTE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exelon has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 13.52%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat Exelon's return on equity of 10.16%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.49%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $47.17 which suggests that it could grow by 11.53%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than Exelon, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than Exelon.

Avista has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 58.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.391, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.885%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Exelon offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than Exelon quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Avista's net income of $79M is lower than Exelon's net income of $908M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.98x while Exelon's PE ratio is 15.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.53x versus 1.79x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 21.75%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat NiSource's return on equity of 8.44%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.49%. On the other hand NiSource has an analysts' consensus of $43.23 which suggests that it could grow by 8.8%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than NiSource.

Avista has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 58.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource has a beta of 0.545, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.504%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. NiSource offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than NiSource quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Avista's net income of $79M is lower than NiSource's net income of $474.8M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.98x while NiSource's PE ratio is 21.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.53x versus 3.09x for NiSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OGE Energy has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 8.39%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat OGE Energy's return on equity of 10.65%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.49%. On the other hand OGE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $44.76 which suggests that it could grow by 2.31%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than OGE Energy, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than OGE Energy.

Avista has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 58.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OGE Energy has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.373%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. OGE Energy offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. OGE Energy pays out 76.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than OGE Energy quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Avista's net income of $79M is higher than OGE Energy's net income of $62.7M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.98x while OGE Energy's PE ratio is 18.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.53x versus 2.81x for OGE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.