CMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FirstEnergy has a net margin of 12.42% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 9.56%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.76% beat FirstEnergy's return on equity of 7.91%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $75.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.72%. On the other hand FirstEnergy has an analysts' consensus of $44.57 which suggests that it could grow by 10.48%. Given that FirstEnergy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe FirstEnergy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstEnergy has a beta of 0.401, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.914%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. FirstEnergy offers a yield of 4.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstEnergy pays out 99.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than FirstEnergy quarterly revenues of $3.8B. CMS Energy's net income of $304M is lower than FirstEnergy's net income of $360M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.93x while FirstEnergy's PE ratio is 21.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.71x versus 1.67x for FirstEnergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 12.42% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 13.33%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.76% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 9.2%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $75.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.72%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $80.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7.93%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.984%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $6.2B. CMS Energy's net income of $304M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $833M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.93x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 28.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.71x versus 6.10x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource has a net margin of 12.42% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 21.75%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.76% beat NiSource's return on equity of 8.44%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $75.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.72%. On the other hand NiSource has an analysts' consensus of $43.23 which suggests that it could grow by 9.38%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource has a beta of 0.545, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.504%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. NiSource offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than NiSource quarterly revenues of $2.2B. CMS Energy's net income of $304M is lower than NiSource's net income of $474.8M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.93x while NiSource's PE ratio is 21.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.71x versus 3.08x for NiSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WEC Energy Group has a net margin of 12.42% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 23%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.76% beat WEC Energy Group's return on equity of 12.85%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $75.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.72%. On the other hand WEC Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of $109.55 which suggests that it could grow by 4.23%. Given that CMS Energy has higher upside potential than WEC Energy Group, analysts believe CMS Energy is more attractive than WEC Energy Group.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WEC Energy Group has a beta of 0.450, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.955%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. WEC Energy Group offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. WEC Energy Group pays out 69.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than WEC Energy Group quarterly revenues of $3.1B. CMS Energy's net income of $304M is lower than WEC Energy Group's net income of $724.5M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.93x while WEC Energy Group's PE ratio is 20.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.71x versus 3.68x for WEC Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.