NI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Edison International has a net margin of 7.96% compared to NiSource's net margin of 11.09%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.09% beat Edison International's return on equity of 8.47%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.41%. On the other hand Edison International has an analysts' consensus of $89.53 which suggests that it could grow by 11.56%. Given that Edison International has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe Edison International is more attractive than NiSource.

NiSource has a beta of 0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 46.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edison International has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.05%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Edison International offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. NiSource pays 64.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Edison International pays out 86.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Edison International quarterly revenues of $5.2B. NiSource's net income of $85.7M is lower than Edison International's net income of $577M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.34x while Edison International's PE ratio is 23.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.14x versus 1.79x for Edison International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FirstEnergy has a net margin of 7.96% compared to NiSource's net margin of 11.24%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.09% beat FirstEnergy's return on equity of 7.09%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.41%. On the other hand FirstEnergy has an analysts' consensus of $47.06 which suggests that it could grow by 17.98%. Given that FirstEnergy has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe FirstEnergy is more attractive than NiSource.

NiSource has a beta of 0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 46.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstEnergy has a beta of 0.512, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.817%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. FirstEnergy offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. NiSource pays 64.02% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstEnergy pays out 82.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than FirstEnergy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. NiSource's net income of $85.7M is lower than FirstEnergy's net income of $419M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.34x while FirstEnergy's PE ratio is 25.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.14x versus 1.71x for FirstEnergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPL has a net margin of 7.96% compared to NiSource's net margin of 10.36%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.09% beat PPL's return on equity of 5.87%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.41%. On the other hand PPL has an analysts' consensus of $35.13 which suggests that it could grow by 7.76%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than NiSource.

NiSource has a beta of 0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 46.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPL has a beta of 0.827, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.265%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. PPL offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. NiSource pays 64.02% of its earnings as a dividend. PPL pays out 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than PPL quarterly revenues of $2.1B. NiSource's net income of $85.7M is lower than PPL's net income of $214M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.34x while PPL's PE ratio is 29.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.14x versus 2.91x for PPL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 7.96% compared to NiSource's net margin of 18.72%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.09% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.44%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.41%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $72.39 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that Xcel Energy has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe Xcel Energy is more attractive than NiSource.

NiSource has a beta of 0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 46.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.995%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. NiSource pays 64.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 61.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.6B. NiSource's net income of $85.7M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $682M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.34x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.14x versus 2.77x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.