UPLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of -40.61% compared to Upland Software's net margin of 11.45%. Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23%.

Upland Software has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 134.81%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $211.74 which suggests that it could grow by 8.06%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Upland Software has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.481% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.047%.

Upland Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upland Software pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upland Software quarterly revenues are $63.7M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M. Notably, Upland Software's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 111.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upland Software is 0.19x versus 15.64x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of -40.61% compared to Upland Software's net margin of 5.06%. Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.46%.

Upland Software has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 134.81%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.37%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than ePlus.

Upland Software has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.481% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.281%.

Upland Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upland Software pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upland Software quarterly revenues are $63.7M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $498.1M. Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M is lower than ePlus's net income of $25.2M. Notably, Upland Software's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 17.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upland Software is 0.19x versus 0.94x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of -40.61% compared to Upland Software's net margin of 15.63%. Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

Upland Software has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 134.81%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.56%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Red Violet.

Upland Software has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.481% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.775, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.54%.

Upland Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Upland Software pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upland Software quarterly revenues are $63.7M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M is lower than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Upland Software's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Violet's PE ratio is 72.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upland Software is 0.19x versus 8.01x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of -40.61% compared to Upland Software's net margin of -9.59%. Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74%.

Upland Software has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 134.81%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $36.85 which suggests that it could grow by 13.74%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Upland Software has a beta of 1.195, which suggesting that the stock is 19.481% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.819%.

Upland Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upland Software pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upland Software quarterly revenues are $63.7M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.1M. Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M is lower than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M. Notably, Upland Software's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upland Software is 0.19x versus 4.19x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.