PANW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 5.06%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.46%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $212.14, signalling upside risk potential of 10.35%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.62%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.189%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than ePlus quarterly revenues of $498.1M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M is higher than ePlus's net income of $25.2M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 109.86x while ePlus's PE ratio is 16.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 15.34x versus 0.88x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

D-Wave Quantum has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of -36.14%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23% beat D-Wave Quantum's return on equity of -339.04%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $212.14, signalling upside risk potential of 10.35%. On the other hand D-Wave Quantum has an analysts' consensus of $16.57 which suggests that it could grow by 2.61%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than D-Wave Quantum, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than D-Wave Quantum.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison D-Wave Quantum has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. D-Wave Quantum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. D-Wave Quantum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than D-Wave Quantum quarterly revenues of $15M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M is higher than D-Wave Quantum's net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 109.86x while D-Wave Quantum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 15.34x versus 168.86x for D-Wave Quantum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 15.63%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $212.14, signalling upside risk potential of 10.35%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.31%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.756, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.639%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 109.86x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 73.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 15.34x versus 8.10x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of -40.61%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $212.14, signalling upside risk potential of 10.35%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 117.95%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.152%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $63.7M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 109.86x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 15.34x versus 0.20x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.