PLUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

i3 Verticals has a net margin of 6.08% compared to ePlus's net margin of -13.46%. ePlus's return on equity of 12.01% beat i3 Verticals's return on equity of 30.26%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.16%. On the other hand i3 Verticals has an analysts' consensus of $27.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.95%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

ePlus has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.978%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. i3 Verticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. i3 Verticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $515.2M, which are larger than i3 Verticals quarterly revenues of $60.9M. ePlus's net income of $31.3M is lower than i3 Verticals's net income of $117.9M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.33x while i3 Verticals's PE ratio is 5.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.93x versus 2.01x for i3 Verticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 6.08% compared to ePlus's net margin of 16.4%. ePlus's return on equity of 12.01% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.16%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $204.24 which suggests that it could grow by 7.78%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

ePlus has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.379%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $515.2M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.1B. ePlus's net income of $31.3M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.33x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 49.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.93x versus 16.24x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 6.08% compared to ePlus's net margin of 9.02%. ePlus's return on equity of 12.01% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.16%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.55%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Red Violet.

ePlus has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.029%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $515.2M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.1M. ePlus's net income of $31.3M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $1.7M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.33x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 104.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.93x versus 7.50x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 6.08% compared to ePlus's net margin of -2.6%. ePlus's return on equity of 12.01% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.16%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.18%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Upland Software.

ePlus has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.379%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $515.2M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. ePlus's net income of $31.3M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.33x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.93x versus 0.46x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.