PLUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 5.06% compared to ePlus's net margin of 11.45%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.46% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $211.74 which suggests that it could grow by 8.84%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

ePlus has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.047%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. ePlus's net income of $25.2M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.70x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 111.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.92x versus 15.52x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 5.06% compared to ePlus's net margin of 15.63%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.46% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.84%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Red Violet.

ePlus has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.775, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.54%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. ePlus's net income of $25.2M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.70x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 76.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.92x versus 8.43x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 5.06% compared to ePlus's net margin of -9.59%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.46% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $36.85 which suggests that it could grow by 17.36%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

ePlus has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.819%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.1M. ePlus's net income of $25.2M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.70x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.92x versus 4.06x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 5.06% compared to ePlus's net margin of -40.61%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.46% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 130.98%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than ePlus.

ePlus has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.481%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $63.7M. ePlus's net income of $25.2M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.70x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.92x versus 0.19x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.