IIIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of -13.46% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 16.4%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 30.26% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.95%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $204.24 which suggests that it could grow by 7.78%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.978% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.379%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.1B. i3 Verticals's net income of $117.9M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.24x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 49.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.01x versus 16.24x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of -13.46% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 6.08%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 30.26% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.95%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.16%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.978% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.876%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. i3 Verticals's net income of $117.9M is higher than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.24x while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.01x versus 0.93x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of -13.46% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 9.02%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 30.26% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.95%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.55%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than Red Violet.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.978% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.029%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.1M. i3 Verticals's net income of $117.9M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $1.7M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.24x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 104.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.01x versus 7.50x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -13.46% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of -2.6%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 30.26% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.95%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.18%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than Upland Software.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.978% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.379%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. i3 Verticals's net income of $117.9M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.24x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.01x versus 0.46x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.