UG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 22.61% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 4.48%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 25.15% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -17.08%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $68.62 which suggests that it could grow by 7.73%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.945, which suggesting that the stock is 5.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.764%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.6%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. United-Guardian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $3.6B. United-Guardian's net income of $560.9K is lower than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of $159M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.28x versus 1.55x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Edgewell Personal Care has a net margin of 22.61% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 4.99%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 25.15% beat Edgewell Personal Care's return on equity of 5.48%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Edgewell Personal Care has an analysts' consensus of $32.38 which suggests that it could grow by 18.16%. Given that Edgewell Personal Care has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Edgewell Personal Care is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.945, which suggesting that the stock is 5.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edgewell Personal Care has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.85%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.6%. Edgewell Personal Care offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Edgewell Personal Care pays out 31.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Edgewell Personal Care quarterly revenues of $580.7M. United-Guardian's net income of $560.9K is lower than Edgewell Personal Care's net income of $29M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while Edgewell Personal Care's PE ratio is 16.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.28x versus 0.61x for Edgewell Personal Care. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interparfums has a net margin of 22.61% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 12.54%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 25.15% beat Interparfums's return on equity of 17.47%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Interparfums has an analysts' consensus of $159.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.69%. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.945, which suggesting that the stock is 5.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interparfums has a beta of 1.327, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.747%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.6%. Interparfums offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums pays out 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Interparfums quarterly revenues of $338.8M. United-Guardian's net income of $560.9K is lower than Interparfums's net income of $42.5M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while Interparfums's PE ratio is 25.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.28x versus 2.85x for Interparfums. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 22.61% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 19.06%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 25.15% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.51 which suggests that it could grow by 3.41%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.945, which suggesting that the stock is 5.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.603%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.6%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. United-Guardian's net income of $560.9K is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.92x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.28x versus 4.86x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.