SLNH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bit Digital has a net margin of -127.29% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of -229.88%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -160.3% beat Bit Digital's return on equity of -22.63%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $5.90 which suggests that it could grow by 136%. Given that Bit Digital has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe Bit Digital is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.857, which suggesting that the stock is 285.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bit Digital has a beta of 5.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 424.873%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than Bit Digital quarterly revenues of $25.1M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.6M is higher than Bit Digital's net income of -$57.7M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bit Digital's PE ratio is 8.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.20x versus 2.49x for Bit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of -127.29% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of 7.22%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -160.3% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $236.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.71%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.857, which suggesting that the stock is 285.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.82%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $208.6M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.6M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 37.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.20x versus 10.04x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -127.29% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of -183.64%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -160.3% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.40 which suggests that it could grow by 80.12%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.857, which suggesting that the stock is 285.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 374.659%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.6M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.20x versus 5.71x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -127.29% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of -178.52%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -160.3% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -42.95%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $6.59 which suggests that it could grow by 67.71%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.857, which suggesting that the stock is 285.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 3.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 200.293%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $34.4M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.6M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$61.4M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.20x versus 11.14x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.